Behind the scenes when coming to Ca and Mg tests

  • Thread starter Thread starter JonasRoman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

JonasRoman

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 6, 2015
Messages
1,292
Reaction score
467
Location
Sweden
What state or country do you live in
Other International
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
As we had a question concerning the salifert ca tests, I take the opportunity to explain how Ca and Mg tests works. This understanding make it more easy to evaluate different tests. I am sure someone has already gone through this, so in that case apologize for a potential repetition.

The colour agent molecule has some hydrogen ions bound to it, and to work it must release some of them. Therefore we must always raise pH to a least 9 ish. At that pH the colour dye release some hydrogen ions, and now works as we want:The colour has a high affinity to Ca and Mg ions, so as long as those are present in solution, the colourdye will take one Ca or Mg ion, and when thats happen the colour molecule will turn red. Now we add EDTA, which has even higher affinity to Ca and Mg than the colour molecule. First EDTA absorb the free Ca and Mg ions, and after that the colour-bounded ones, and when last ion is released from the colour dye, colour molecule turns back to blue. EDTA "absorb" Ca and Mg in a molar ratio of 1/1 so if you used X molar to convert the colour, it was X molar Ca+Mg in the solution.

This EDTA titration gives the sum of the Mg and Ca. To get only Ca, we must first hide the Mg ions, and that is achieved by raise pH even further , to 11-12. That will create Magnesiumhydroxide immediately (cloudy) and now its only free Ca ions in the solution, and we do same titration with EDTA as above.

If we want to do opposite, only titrate Mg directly its not that easy to selectively "remove" the Ca ions, but possible with ca selective absorber, like oxalat for instance (red sea uses this). But its not 100% selective, so its easy to get some Mg bound aswell, OR not bind all Ca, giving easily both false low and high results. Thats why Mg tests are all of them more o less not so accurate.

One way to solve this is to make a total titration of Ca and Mg as I described in the beginning, thus increase pH to only 9, thus high enough to make the colour work, but not so high so we create Magnesium hydroxide. Such a titration will give Mg+Ca. After that we do a separate Ca titration , (those are very accurate as its easy to isolate Mg by just increase pH to 12). The diff between the sum and Ca is ofcourse Mg.



/Jonas
 
dang, I was able to find cheap EDTA and NaOH in analytical grade, but the color agent (presumably murexide) is really expensive, so it doesn't seem like a DIY test is worth it...

Thanks for the detailed explanation. I feel like if more people understood how their tests work, it would help to understand their limitations and why they can be prone to error.
 
dang, I was able to find cheap EDTA and NaOH in analytical grade, but the color agent (presumably murexide) is really expensive, so it doesn't seem like a DIY test is worth it...

Thanks for the detailed explanation. I feel like if more people understood how their tests work, it would help to understand their limitations and why they can be prone to error.
Exactly 👌
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHICH SUPPOSEDLY EASY CORAL HAS GIVEN YOU THE MOST TROUBLE?

  • Zoanthids or palythoas

    Votes: 9 23.7%
  • Mushrooms or Ricordea

    Votes: 8 21.1%
  • Green star polyps

    Votes: 5 13.2%
  • Xenia

    Votes: 4 10.5%
  • Leather corals

    Votes: 3 7.9%
  • Duncan or candy cane corals

    Votes: 7 18.4%
  • Birdsnest or Montipora digitata

    Votes: 10 26.3%
  • None—mine have lived up to the reputation

    Votes: 3 7.9%
  • Other (tell us which one)

    Votes: 2 5.3%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new