Calcium reactor help choosing

ncfishguy

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
1,007
Reaction score
123
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a 90 gallon mixed reef like to get a calcium reactor what size would be good fit and reliable
 

GoVols

Cobb / Webb - 1989
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
13,076
Reaction score
35,080
Location
In-The-Boro, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Been running this main stage
https://www.geosreef.com/product/geo-cr612-calcium-reactor/

With this secondary chamber
https://www.geosreef.com/product/smc415/

For... about and year and a half and love the setup... :)

1104171746.jpg
1026171830a.jpg
1101171722.jpg



Shoot @geo a pm and let them hook you up.
 
Last edited:

Darrick Dutcher

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
86
Reaction score
33
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a larger system but I highly recommend a GEO system. I set mine and I don't have to look at it for 6 months. Amazing growth on SPS with minimal dosing
 

kles

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 13, 2015
Messages
58
Reaction score
38
Location
San Antonio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lifereef simple and been around years used one for many years and still going . Customer service is great .
 

Bpb

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
4,518
Reaction score
6,169
Location
College Station
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I love my geo reactor. MTC is no longer building but those are great too. I have friends who love their lifereef ones. The reactors are all pretty similar. It’s the regulator and feed pump method that really make or break the reactor
 

ca1ore

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 28, 2014
Messages
14,193
Reaction score
19,711
Location
Stamford, CT
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Hard to beat the MTC models .... but you have to find them second hand since the company is no longer doing business. My ProCal is almost 20 years old. Lifereef would be my second choice followed by geo.
 

RandyC

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
701
Reaction score
937
Location
Bay Area, California
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Geo's are great. Built like tanks and made to last. Calcium reactors don't really have size limitations, the size of the reactor just really determines how often you have to add new media. I'd also recommend getting a secondary reactor to help raise the pH before the effluent enters your tank.

The Geo 612 paired with the Geo SMC410 (secondary reactor) will serve you well. If space is a concern, I've also run the Geo Nano with a SMC410 on a 90 gallon tank.
 

mnml

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
439
Reaction score
715
Location
Ladera Ranch, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Geo's are great. Built like tanks and made to last. Calcium reactors don't really have size limitations, the size of the reactor just really determines how often you have to add new media. I'd also recommend getting a secondary reactor to help raise the pH before the effluent enters your tank.

The Geo 612 paired with the Geo SMC410 (secondary reactor) will serve you well. If space is a concern, I've also run the Geo Nano with a SMC410 on a 90 gallon tank.

What do you run in the 2nd media reactor to help raise ph? I currently have a kalk stirrer from Avast Marine and am looking to add a GEO 612 soon.
 

RandyC

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
701
Reaction score
937
Location
Bay Area, California
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
What do you run in the 2nd media reactor to help raise ph? I currently have a kalk stirrer from Avast Marine and am looking to add a GEO 612 soon.

Just more reactor media (Reborn) and Remag. pH will increase with more contact time with media as it dissolves it.
 

mnml

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
439
Reaction score
715
Location
Ladera Ranch, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just more reactor media (Reborn) and Remag. pH will increase with more contact time with media as it dissolves it.

Thanks Randy. Still doing a lot of reading on setting up a CaRx so your feedback is appreciate.
 

Maacc

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 26, 2016
Messages
1,173
Reaction score
1,592
Location
Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

Reefiness

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 15, 2016
Messages
568
Reaction score
301
Location
Staten Island, NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've been looking into getting a calcium reactor as well being that I currently dose about 250ml of each 2 part. I like the idea of 2 Chambers to raise pH and have been considering the dual reef octo ones. Also I really like the octo varios pumps so also considering that one but unfortunately it doesn't come with an option for varios and 2 Chambers. Anyone have experience with the octo reactors?
 

jda

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
14,342
Reaction score
21,756
Location
Boulder, CO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Most people recommend what they have. They just recirculate water. Get a quality brand with a quality pump and you will be more than OK. A CaRx is not a high tech piece of equipment. IMO, the regulator is more important than the water circulation chamber (reactor).

I have used GEO, Knopp, Korallin, MTC, AquaMaxx, k2r and probably more. I am using two Korallin and a AquaMaxx that I won at a raffle, currently. They each have things that I love and hate. I love how the Korallin traps excess co2 in the top to help me tune. The AquaMaxx has a chamber for filter floss to keep debris out of the CaRx, but does not trap co2, so I run it tipped on it's side a bit during tuning time.

I used to be a huge fan of reverse flow, but that is not a huge deal anymore with the larger media that should not get compacted. I do like a good reliable pump that can handle some small particles - ehiem excels at this.

Reborn or ARM work the same for me... or any natural media. I use 50lb sack every 6-7 months, so I just buy what is on sale between ARM large or Reborn. Dolomite can help supply extra magnesium. Man-Made reactor media is just calcium and carbonate (no mag, strontium or other traces) and takes more co2 to dissolve, so I avoid it.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 37 27.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 46 34.1%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 30 22.2%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 12 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.4%
Back
Top