Cannon 100mm lens

  • Thread starter Thread starter lxeroxl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

lxeroxl

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 7, 2012
Messages
329
Reaction score
8
Location
Orlando fl
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have an older cannon 40d and am looking to get a macro lens.

Need some help deciding If I should pay up for the l version with IS or if I should cheap out and get a tarmon

This lens would prob only ever get used for taking picture of my tank

Do those of you with the L lens find the IS to be worth while
 
IS will be a smaller benefit if you're diligent about using a tripod for your shots. If you're not then it might be worth the extra money. I actually have the L but I justify it because I use it for portraits too :)
 
What are the focal lengths? I have a 300mm, but it has a 6' focal length.
 
The minimum focus distance on the 100mm L is .3m (~12"). Not sure about the Tamron but I would assume that it isn't too different. If you use extension tubes you could probably largely negate any difference if there is some.
 
That's much better than 6'. I think the lens I have is sigma 70mm-300mm. I normally just use the 18mm-55mm that came with the camera though.
 
you can't go wrong with the quality of the glass in the L series from cannon
 
I like the L just having a hard time justifying the extra cost when i will mostly be shooting for my reef and everything i have read says to use a tripod
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHICH SUPPOSEDLY EASY CORAL HAS GIVEN YOU THE MOST TROUBLE?

  • Zoanthids or palythoas

    Votes: 11 19.6%
  • Mushrooms or Ricordea

    Votes: 10 17.9%
  • Green star polyps

    Votes: 6 10.7%
  • Xenia

    Votes: 6 10.7%
  • Leather corals

    Votes: 6 10.7%
  • Duncan or candy cane corals

    Votes: 13 23.2%
  • Birdsnest or Montipora digitata

    Votes: 14 25.0%
  • None—mine have lived up to the reputation

    Votes: 4 7.1%
  • Other (tell us which one)

    Votes: 3 5.4%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new