Carbon and gfo Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter ncfishguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

ncfishguy

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
1,007
Reaction score
123
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Do you really need a reactor to run gfo and carbon couldn't you just put it in your sump in a bag in between the baffles or something like that???
 
Yes you can, it's more a passive way to filter as opposed to an active upflow-style reactor and IMO, a bit less effective.
 
Short answer no. Best results are with a reactor though.
 
Yes, it is done that way a lot. Not as efficient though as already mentioned but it does work if you find a place with a medium flow so it passes through the media bag without agitating the media too much so it does not grind itself to dust. I have placed it in bags in my modified Aqua Clear HOB refugium on my 16G nano for years.
 
Carbon definitely but GFO should be in a reactor so that it is fluidized. Up until this tank in a bag is the only way I ever used carbon. But like others have said you can do GFO in a bag just not as efficient.
 
Awesome I'll do the carbon in a bag and just keep gfo in reactor
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

IF YOU WERE CHOOSING YOUR MAIN REEF TANK TODAY, WHAT SIZE WOULD YOU PICK COMPARED WITH YOUR CURRENT

  • Much smaller

    Votes: 2 3.6%
  • A little smaller

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • About the same

    Votes: 2 3.6%
  • A little larger

    Votes: 17 30.9%
  • Much larger

    Votes: 21 38.2%
  • About the same volume, but different dimensions

    Votes: 6 10.9%
  • I’d keep this one and add a second tank

    Votes: 4 7.3%
  • I don’t have a reef tank yet

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 3 5.5%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new