With @Jay Hemdal recent updated QT protocol and @Humblefish Hybrid TTM protocol, we have two tools to increase our success for keeping healthy fish and disease out of our display tanks.
As a Reefer, I'm always looking to use the right tool for job and preferably the easiest that ensures success.
Assuming both protocols work if followed correctly , which method should one use for which situations? Which one is more "work"? Which one costs more? Which one is more prone to errors?
To simplify the discussion, let's make the following assumptions.
Hybrid TTM will use 2 small buckets or tanks (5-10gal) with identical setups and provide adequate heating and aeration.
Current QT Protocol will use a larger insta-cycled tank with adequate heating, aeration, and size to house the fish for extended time.
Link to Current QT Protocol:
https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/current-quarantine-protocol.825055/
Link to Hybrid TTM:
https://humble.fish/community/index.php?threads/hybrid-ttm-to-treat-all-parasites.87/
As a Reefer, I'm always looking to use the right tool for job and preferably the easiest that ensures success.
Assuming both protocols work if followed correctly , which method should one use for which situations? Which one is more "work"? Which one costs more? Which one is more prone to errors?
To simplify the discussion, let's make the following assumptions.
Hybrid TTM will use 2 small buckets or tanks (5-10gal) with identical setups and provide adequate heating and aeration.
Current QT Protocol will use a larger insta-cycled tank with adequate heating, aeration, and size to house the fish for extended time.
Link to Current QT Protocol:
https://www.reef2reef.com/threads/current-quarantine-protocol.825055/
Link to Hybrid TTM:
https://humble.fish/community/index.php?threads/hybrid-ttm-to-treat-all-parasites.87/
