Determining total system volume

fmp47

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2015
Messages
73
Reaction score
27
Location
Georgia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is there a method to determine total system volume by adding a known quantity (Mg, Ca, alk) to an unknown volume and then measuring change or dilution of that level of chemical?
Over the last 4 years I have removed live rock from the sump, added ceramic blocks, etc.

I would love to get an accurate measurement of volume rather than a guess.
 

dbl

It Takes Less Energy to be Nice
View Badges
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
15,944
Reaction score
83,682
Location
SW Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not sure if there is a way to measure as you've requested above, but here is a handy little tool that might help. You'll need to at least estimate weight of rock and sand, but it should get you close.

http://reef.diesyst.com/volcalc/volcalc.html
 

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,548
Reaction score
1,645
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The question in the original post is an interesting one, from an analytical point of view. The answer is fundamentally the product of two other questions: (1) How precisely can I measure analyte X? and (2) How much of analyte X can I add without adversely affecting the health of my tank's inhabitants?

You need to be able to take your tank from some relatively low value of some analyte you can measure, and then dose a relatively large amount of that analyte all at once. You need to also be able to test immediately before the dosing, and also long enough after the dosing for the dose to have reached equilibrium with the rest of the tank water. You also need to be able to measure the absolute amount of the analyte added during the dose.

One considerable limiting factor is the difference between the lowest recommended and highest recommended amounts of the analyte. It's not as though you can take Magnesium, for example, from 0 PPM to 1500 PPM at once; you will more likely be taking it from 1100 PPM to 1500 PPM, or something like that. Even if you can measure (in this example) Mg to +/- 15 PPM, and your method uncertainty for the Mg test is along the lines of 15 PPM / 1380 PPM = 1.1%, your relative precision for measuring the difference before-and-after is closer to 30 PPM (2 * 15 PPM) / 400 PPM (the difference between 1500 PPM and 1100 PPM) = 7.5%. Add to this the uncertainty in the actual amount of the analyte dosed, which could be from 1 to 5%, then the uncertainty in the estimated tank volume is likely around 10% or so.

So, if you are comfortable using this technique to say that your tank volume is, for example, 100 gallons +/- 10 gallons, then it just might work for you, if you pay careful attention to each detail of the process.

That said, I have used this exact technique, together with a Total Hardness (Mg + Ca + Sr) method with a precision of around 0.25%, and the ability to measure the concentration of MgCl2 to within 0.1%, to estimate my total tank volume to be 201 gallons +/- 5 gallons. With precise methods, this technique can be used to accomplish your goal, within reason, but it does require more equipment and dedication to consistent methods than most hobbyists are willing to commit to.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,232
Reaction score
92,241
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think that for most folks, testing uncertainty is too high for this method to be much better than guessing based on tank size and rock amount. :)
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.6%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 43 35.0%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.0%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.5%
Back
Top