Done with GHA !!! - 27,000 mg dose of Fluconazol one time, along with 115 ml of Vibrant per week.

14 foot reef

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 22, 2018
Messages
560
Reaction score
802
I've been Battling GHA for 4 months with zero headway. Contacted Jeff and Vibrant and he suggested one dose of 20mg per gallon of Fluconazol plus his vibrant. He is confident I'll be algae free in 14 days !!!!!
I'm very excited and all in. Dosed tonight with his personal help via phone. Jeff, thank you for your personal attention.
Here we go !!! look out GHA !!!!!
 
Best reef aquarium LED lighting

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
9,575
Reaction score
7,360
Location
tejas
in all fairness though, both products in their work threads are not 100% effective on target but 80%+ seats them permanently in our tool box that's for sure.

agreed you are mass dosing, that's a new variable but there's something beyond water actions you can consider or at least test during this type of resolve: actual man grazing.

while you wait for water actions to work and save tons of direct access, make one single test rock comply in your tank without that fluc or vibrant. Take out the rock, use a knife tip to roughly score and debride the algae off like your a dentist v plaque, rocks bleed a bit due to rough handling.

the whole rock is algae free due to your 45 min job using metal and strength precision to score out the anchors which makes your rock in the condition it would be in if you had the worlds luckiest grazer arrangement.

only when that rock is 100% clean due to your sweat and no more waiting, just this one rock doesn't mean you have to do them all, put peroxide all over it. This does NOT kill the bac, its still able to handle bioload if tested alone. same as untreated rock. the peroxide kills cellular plant bits and holdfasts you missed, and can actually get to them now that you removed the canopy once allowed

have one rock that is handled without any alternate BUT to be algae free, and monitor it among the group of rocks we're hoping to be. Extract from this adventure what you will :)
B
 

TheHarold

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
3,613
Reaction score
5,848
in all fairness though, both products in their work threads are not 100% effective on target but 80%+ seats them permanently in our tool box that's for sure.

agreed you are mass dosing, that's a new variable but there's something beyond water actions you can consider or at least test during this type of resolve: actual man grazing.

while you wait for water actions to work and save tons of direct access, make one single test rock comply in your tank without that fluc or vibrant. Take out the rock, use a knife tip to roughly score and debride the algae off like your a dentist v plaque, rocks bleed a bit due to rough handling.

the whole rock is algae free due to your 45 min job using metal and strength precision to score out the anchors which makes your rock in the condition it would be in if you had the worlds luckiest grazer arrangement.

only when that rock is 100% clean due to your sweat and no more waiting, just this one rock doesn't mean you have to do them all, put peroxide all over it. This does NOT kill the bac, its still able to handle bioload if tested alone. same as untreated rock. the peroxide kills cellular plant bits and holdfasts you missed, and can actually get to them now that you removed the canopy once allowed

have one rock that is handled without any alternate BUT to be algae free, and monitor it among the group of rocks we're hoping to be. Extract from this adventure what you will :)
B
If it is a 14 foot reef, I don’t think you can remove all rock and pick out every speck and root of algae. 45 minutes applies to a vase with 5lb of rock, not a larger system with 500lb :)
 

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
9,575
Reaction score
7,360
Location
tejas
I have some work linkable from the willing who were resolved large tank raspers. Not 14 ft agreed ~

its not practical, but who says its only applicable in hindsight> if he sees how well it works, wont that make the 1st growth on the 1st rock in the redone tank have a new care option?

It is practical when the whole tank isn't a challenge, and its just one rock. But since we're always finding ways NOT to effect control, things take over fully.

That's why I said take from it what you will...the right size tank to select and stock out with ten grand in corals is any size tank where direct access isn't precluded, for any reason.

also, what if a large tank owner wants to build a tank where a few pounds of accessible rocks are controlled, early on, vs a massive untouchable rock wall

Readers with accessible tanks might take the idea to try before total takeover, and 14fr might have smaller tanks as well, it's no harm to practice

nobody gets any practice in this hobby absolutely commanding an outcome, modeling that in a vase or in a large tank has benefits for both readers and the owner. 1 rock, no harm, learn that ultimate control is possible, upscale it only if you have to/need to. its better than total guessing is my angle. That's a truly massive reef wow

True resolve includes possible hard work options too imo
 
Last edited:

brandon429

why did you put a reef in that
View Badges
Joined
Dec 9, 2014
Messages
9,575
Reaction score
7,360
Location
tejas
that sounds like a rocket ship of a setup. Id still test rock one five pound section because if its still growing back right at your peak doser offer that gives some sort of insight about the future, after you've hopefully killed it off using water means. It just doesn't hurt to see how different algae control models respond in a reef that big, and its easy to make one test rock comply just to learn about your invader

wow

hey would you rate that reef as heavy detritus retention or low? if you swish a given test rock with algae in tank, does a lot of castings come off?
how about sandbed, did you use one in that huge reef

am gauging growback mechanisms for the future, assuming you get it controlled in one or more ways. that detritus is the universal alternation of invasion generations feed, curious how much collection zones that huge reef has.
 
Last edited:
World Wide Corals - Quality Aqua-cultured Coral
OP
14 foot reef

14 foot reef

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 22, 2018
Messages
560
Reaction score
802
that sounds like a rocket ship of a setup. Id still test rock one five pound section because if its still growing back right at your peak doser offer that gives some sort of insight about the future, after you've hopefully killed it off using water means. It just doesn't hurt to see how different algae control models respond in a reef that big, and its easy to make one test rock comply just to learn about your invader

wow

hey would you rate that reef as heavy detritus retention or low? if you swish a given test rock with algae in tank, does a lot of castings come off?
how about sandbed, did you use one in that huge reef

am gauging growback mechanisms for the future, assuming you get it controlled in one or more ways. that detritus is the universal alternation of invasion generations feed, curious how much collection zones that huge reef has.
The tank does suffer from detritus zones, the crushed coral is random depths as the Oceans Motion valve on one of the 5000 GPH return pumps keeps things moving around along with 2 MP60's the tank really could use 2 more MP60's but i would have to drain the tank to insert 2 more dry boxes for the dry ends. Not really an option. The tank was set up for 17 years then two years ago I did a complete tear down bleach out and 100% new restart. All new substrate all new Life Rock and amonia cycle. After the cycle the tank ran on the triton method for 18 months with very little success. I switched over to AWC method and change out water hourly at a small rate for a total of 300 gallons per month. The tank is doing much better now on this method, but there are a few problems still to conquer. The GHA and Aptasia. Hopefully the Fluco and Vibrant will kick the GHA and the aptasia is being handled by predators. CBB, green file fish, declivas butterfly, Black Zoster Butterfly and my new helper, The Holo Holo Angel. I'm hoping by end of January we are back to a clean reef. Nothing happens fast in this hobby, patience is a virtue here.
 
Last edited:
OP
14 foot reef

14 foot reef

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 22, 2018
Messages
560
Reaction score
802
70% of my GHA is gone, the combo of the Fluconazol and vibrant seem to be doing exactly what Jeff at Underwater Creations said it would in the timeline he estimated. I haven't lost any SPS yet but I will add that my LPS corals are a little tightened up or shrunken(Not as full and extended) but I'll take that considering the 6 month battle of GHA has turned around completely in just 2 weeks. I think as others have said, there are less stressful and less aggressive methods than this approach. But if monitored and closely watched, I think this is a solid prescription to get rid of an infestation of GHA. I probably would caution everyone who tries this, and I would also try everything else first, but if clean up crews, water quality and good take maintenance don't work, this surely is and option.
I noticed the GHA turning white within a few days of the Fluconazol. Then continuing, the GHA in the Brightest and strongests light areas died first, the lower light areas and in the sheltered light areas are the last to be turning white and dying, I'm probably going to run this for one more week before I start skimming out the Fluconazol. I will continue the Vibrant until all is gone. But I think 3 weeks with the Skimmer just boiling over back to the sump with the Fluconazol in the system is enough. Going to try and play it safe, and start removing the Fluconazol, as i'm not sure of the long term effect on the LPS. I did NOT have a spike of Nitrates or PO4. I did NOT run GFO either. My PO4 has stayed at .08 and my nitrates are at 1 and have stayed there. I tested for them both three times a week as I was concerned about a nutrient release and spike. That DID NOT happen.
 

Where do you go in case of a real reef tank emergency?

  • Me, myself and I

    Votes: 279 43.2%
  • Local Friend

    Votes: 65 10.1%
  • Reef2Reef

    Votes: 252 39.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 50 7.7%

Online statistics

Members online
1,510
Guests online
4,630
Total visitors
6,140
Mode Aquariums
Top