Embracing a new concept...and freeing our minds from preconception. Not easy.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,421
Reaction score
63,783
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
By the way I always thought the best way for the removal of organics would be a dialysis approach...an alternative to dilution is the solution mentality...

I'm not sure of the benefit of doing that rather than a water change.

Small organics could be removed this way, but it would take a lot of dialysis fluid (at best, removing 50% of the organics would require 100% of the tank water volume in dialysis fluid), and so could not be more efficient than a water change (is less efficient, actually). It would also equilibrate every inorganic ion with the dialysis fluid if the pores were large enough for organics to pass.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,421
Reaction score
63,783
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Sweet Baby Jeebus Randy, I dang near spat out my cereal looking at those prices!

:lol:

Yes, it is so expensive that I've never used them. The only time I did such measurements was when I could use the machine free at work. :)
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,421
Reaction score
63,783
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
One issue is the limit of detection for some of these trace elements.

Take copper, with a stated limit of detection of 1.2 to 3.5 ppb.

That's about ten times higher than the NSW value.

So one cannot use this method to dose up to or maintain the NSW value, even if your tank started lower. About all you can know is whether your tank has more than ten times the natural level, or not.

Still useful, but not in the simplistic way of matching NSW. :)
 

hart24601

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
6,579
Reaction score
6,633
Location
Iowa
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This is really neat and I am excited to see how it plays out. Now get Randy on board with it and I will be very, very excited!
 

reggaedrummin

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 8, 2014
Messages
273
Reaction score
1
Location
San Francisco
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm quite interested in this. The concept of water changes has never made sense to me. It feels like guess work and frankly, quite tedious and wasteful. I'm not sure that we're exactly there yet, but I welcome the day when I can eliminate water changes.
 
OP
OP
uniquecorals

uniquecorals

UniqueCorals
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
12,841
Reaction score
10,617
Location
Los Angeles
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I just have to say that I am really happy with the spirit of this discussion...I had this fear of it degenerating into one of those contentious, devisive discussions with people bringing in all sorts of weird biases, accusations, and taunts. You're a great group, and I really appreciate the participation! Randy, it's been awesome having you aboard to give us the low down on a number of things...It's so easy for us laymen to get caught up in misinformed, jargon-laden, assumption-tainted discourses, which is exactly what we'd like to avoid here!

Intersting you commented on copper, as that was a surprise in some of our tests...


I think that there is so much that we take for granted in this hobby; it's really interesting to get some concise data upon which to base our knowledge, rather than just assume. We tend to do it a lot in the hobby, I think! I hope that this type of stuff spurs more of us to crack open a chemistry textbook and do some learning, to make sense of some of this!
 

mike007

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
7,217
Reaction score
400
Location
WEST TEXAS
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Okay this sounds logical if it really works. My question is that I am confused about is the water changes are they saying they never do them at all? I had talked with some experts at Macna about reduced water changes. This is very interesting.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,421
Reaction score
63,783
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Randy, it's been awesome having you aboard to give us the low down on a number of things...It's so easy for us laymen to get caught up in misinformed, jargon-laden, assumption-tainted discourses, which is exactly what we'd like to avoid here!

Intersting you commented on copper, as that was a surprise in some of our tests...
!

Thanks. :)

Surprised that you saw a lot, or didn't see any?
 
OP
OP
uniquecorals

uniquecorals

UniqueCorals
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
12,841
Reaction score
10,617
Location
Los Angeles
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Okay this sounds logical if it really works. My question is that I am confused about is the water changes are they saying they never do them at all? I had talked with some experts at Macna about reduced water changes. This is very interesting.

Again, this is the area that I have the hardest time getting my head around...It's really unknown territory for me, the water change addict! Relying on other forms of nutrient export makes sense in theory...I will see how it works in practice...Triton profers doing water changes if you have a special need, like a clam spawning, a large animal death; stuff like that. However, they do not recommend regular water changes, for the reasons previously discussed...It will be very interesting to see how this works long term!

Scott
 
OP
OP
uniquecorals

uniquecorals

UniqueCorals
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
12,841
Reaction score
10,617
Location
Los Angeles
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks. :)

Surprised that you saw a lot, or didn't see any?

Actually surprised that we had a really high level of copper out of the mains water, pre RO/DI...

And, surprised that the copper level was undetectable in our raceways...As you mentioned, apparently the limit of detection is pretty high!

Man, I love this stuff...LOL:neutral:
 

tmg1286

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
58
Reaction score
3
Location
Windermere, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Another interesting article Scott. Thanks. By the way, have a safe trip, and bring us back "the facts."
 
OP
OP
uniquecorals

uniquecorals

UniqueCorals
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
12,841
Reaction score
10,617
Location
Los Angeles
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Another interesting article Scott. Thanks. By the way, have a safe trip, and bring us back "the facts."

Thanks, we're hoping to glean some good information to share...And we will share what we learn, for sure! Looking forward to more discussion.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,421
Reaction score
63,783
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Actually surprised that we had a really high level of copper out of the mains water, pre RO/DI...

And, surprised that the copper level was undetectable in our raceways...As you mentioned, apparently the limit of detection is pretty high!

Man, I love this stuff...LOL:neutral:

When folks say tap water is good for their tank, and so others should try it, you can respond with that info! :D
 

mike007

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
7,217
Reaction score
400
Location
WEST TEXAS
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not to mention the phosphate additives to preserve the city mains.
 

Acro

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
503
Reaction score
4
Location
Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very interesting read so far. Would love to know how detritus is dealt with as I would be able to replace my live rock with mounds of fish poop instead lol
 

berbotty

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
54
Reaction score
2
Location
kansas city
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I rarely do a wc and when I do my corals more importantly my sps hate it. My RBTA disappears for a week and generally things look terrible. I never have nitrate of phosphates and feed heavy. 200 gallon total water, my skimmer is rated for 500
 
OP
OP
uniquecorals

uniquecorals

UniqueCorals
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
12,841
Reaction score
10,617
Location
Los Angeles
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Isn't the method a continual water change?
Xyz dosed and the same amount removed either via skimming or removed via a doser?

Wow...that's a cool way of looking at it. A "deconstructed water change", perhaps? Hmm...

Dang, now you're getting me thinking even more (a scary proposition...). The question, I suppose, is weather you could precisely match export to import or consumption..arghh...

Thoughts on this concept, anyone?
 
OP
OP
uniquecorals

uniquecorals

UniqueCorals
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
12,841
Reaction score
10,617
Location
Los Angeles
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Very interesting read so far. Would love to know how detritus is dealt with as I would be able to replace my live rock with mounds of fish poop instead lol

Well, that's the extreme,right? LOL

I have long felt that detritus is not all that bad, if not accumulating in excessive amounts...With a group pif detritivorous fishes (Ie, Ctenochaetus Tangs and maybe some Centropyge Angels) and inverts, this could be mitigated to some extent. Ehsan favors a shallow sand bed (like 2cm)...Again, I'll get more clarification and make some firsthand observations next week...Good stuff!
 

Reefing threads: Do you wear gear from reef brands?

  • I wear reef gear everywhere.

    Votes: 38 15.9%
  • I wear reef gear primarily at fish events and my LFS.

    Votes: 14 5.9%
  • I wear reef gear primarily for water changes and tank maintenance.

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • I wear reef gear primarily to relax where I live.

    Votes: 30 12.6%
  • I don’t wear gear from reef brands.

    Votes: 139 58.2%
  • Other.

    Votes: 17 7.1%
Back
Top