GFO.

atoll

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
5,859
Reaction score
10,670
Location
Wales UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Humpty question inbound.

Is GFO all the same no matter what the brand? I don't mean the granules size but exactly the same material?

Different brands suggest different amounts to be used for the same size of aquarium and PO4 level suggesting it differs in quality and ability to absorb phosphates. Its all Granular Ferric Oxide after all so why should one GFO brand differ substantially from another or is it all a matter of advertising spin?
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,230
Reaction score
92,241
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No.

The binding of phosphate to GFO is a surface event. Different brands may have different surface area per gram for binding.

That said, I would not be sure the different brands are comparing apples to apples.
 
OP
OP
atoll

atoll

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
5,859
Reaction score
10,670
Location
Wales UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No.

The binding of phosphate to GFO is a surface event. Different brands may have different surface area per gram for binding.

That said, I would not be sure the different brands are comparing apples to apples.
Thanks, So in truth we might be paying a lot more for a pretty fish or coral on the tub compared with an unbranded GFO. I have used both and haven't noticed any difference apart from the price.
 

BryanM

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 27, 2024
Messages
7,651
Reaction score
9,361
Location
Morgan Hill
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Thanks, So in truth we might be paying a lot more for a pretty fish or coral on the tub compared with an unbranded GFO. I have used both and haven't noticed any difference apart from the price.
I have heard from someone I trust that they definitely are not all the same, even though there are sources out there that state they are.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,230
Reaction score
92,241
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks, So in truth we might be paying a lot more for a pretty fish or coral on the tub compared with an unbranded GFO. I have used both and haven't noticed any difference apart from the price.

That could be, yes.

GFO is made on an industrial scale for removal of arsenic from drinking water. Bayoxide E33 is a major brand. Many hobby companies likely use it.


This shows detail tech specs:

 

revhtree

Owner Administrator
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
53,908
Reaction score
118,904
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I read your title and was thinking…”well that’s not nice!”

Ha! Jk of course.
 

exnisstech

Grumpy old man
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
18,920
Reaction score
30,366
Location
Ashland Ohio
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Can't comment on one working better than another but I find rowaphos is much easier to use than the typical orange colored bulk type of GFO. The rowa is kind if moist not powdery and doesn't take nearly as long to rinse clean vs the bulk. This is just my experience. The rowa is a bit more expensive than bulk so it may not be worth the price difference to some but I only run GFO occasionally so I don't mine the extra cost for less mess and less waste.
 
OP
OP
atoll

atoll

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
5,859
Reaction score
10,670
Location
Wales UK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.9%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 42 34.4%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.1%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.0%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top