GHA Issue and Plan of Attack

CZS_0017

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Messages
6
Reaction score
6
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hello All,

I have newly established RSM E 170 that is just over a month old. I know this subject has been beat to death but I am very frustrated with the explosion of GHA in my tank. Currently my Phospates are at .08ppm and Nitrates are at 0. These levels have remained constant for a week now despite dosing NOPOX at 50% the recommended dosage based on my nitrates being zero. I know what fueled the explosion, when I added my CUC a bunch of snails, a few hermits, and an emerald crab died (testing indicated tank had cycled, did not acclimate CUC properly) and were not removed in time. The gha then exploded and overtook my tank.

Currently I have an algae blenny, small kole tang, several scarlet and zebra hermits, 3 turbo snails, and handful of cerith and nassarius, lastly one emerald crab. Only 2 coral - a frogspawn and zoas.

I hate losing. I have done everything according to Red Sea's Reef mature program, followed by their algae management system. I test my water every few days and I use RO/DI water <2ppm TDS. I use Red Sea Coral Pro Salt and perform weekly water changes of 10%.

My current plan of attack: Remove the RS GAC, suspend NOPOX dosing, add Chemipure Elite and Purigen. Once phosphate decreases to 0, hold it there until the GHA starves. Then remove CPE, add back in plain GAC, resume dosing NOPOX and bring parameters back to Red Seas recommended levels for an SPS dominant tank (for future plans). If the CPE does not bring the Phosphates to zero I will run a bag of PURA GFO.

My question is will this plan of attack work? I figure the only way to beat GHA is to starve it out based on the research I've done. I will continue dosing Reef Energy A and B to keep the corals feed. Any advice or feedback will be greatly appreciated.
 

GoVols

Cobb / Webb - 1989
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
13,078
Reaction score
37,560
Location
In-The-Boro, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Welcome to Reef 2 Reef!!!

Is the GHA all over the place or just on your live rock?
 
OP
OP
C

CZS_0017

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Messages
6
Reaction score
6
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ill send pictures when I get home. Its all over several of the rocks and in the sand. Plus i have other types of nuisance algae all over
 

GoVols

Cobb / Webb - 1989
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
13,078
Reaction score
37,560
Location
In-The-Boro, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Ill send pictures when I get home. Its all over several of the rocks and in the sand. Plus i have other types of nuisance algae all over
Pictures are good for everyone to go by.

Sometimes algae can hold in phosphates from the water column and test kits will not detect them.

But, You got a young reef and could just be going thru a stage of the ugly's.

Tumbling GFO in it own reactor was a life saver for my reef. Beats carbon dosing in my book and your reef is so young.

Which test kits do you use for nitrates and phosphates?
 
OP
OP
C

CZS_0017

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 7, 2018
Messages
6
Reaction score
6
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I use redsea pro test kits.
Here is the situation in pics
20180207_185647.jpg


20180207_185651.jpg
 

saltyfilmfolks

Lights! Camera! Reef!
View Badges
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
28,739
Reaction score
40,932
Location
California
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
My current plan of attack: Remove the RS GAC, suspend NOPOX dosing, add Chemipure Elite and Purigen. Once phosphate decreases to 0, hold it there until the GHA starves. Then remove CPE, add back in plain GAC, resume dosing NOPOX and bring parameters back to Red Seas recommended levels for an SPS dominant tank (for future plans). If the CPE does not bring the Phosphates to zero I will run a bag of PURA GFO.
A couple things.
You don’t want zeros. It actually not good for the tank in general. A ULNS is not easy. (I also have stupid n/p and no gha)

I’d stop the nopox completely. You have almost no no3.

GAC and GFO are basically purigen and chemipure.
You have almost no Po4

Just run carbon imo. I’d stop trying to mess with the nutrients. It’s not what is fueling the GHA.

What we see most commonly now is overs stripping and the dreaded Dino’s. Or worse.


It’s also a young and the nutrients are going to fluctuate as well as the other parameters. Don’t sweat those.

Something else is going on that tank. The sand gha is an indicator. It’s not common.

Off hand wild guess , tds should be zero.

It’s only a month old tank. Give it time and scrubbing.
It may be to program , I forget) but that’s pretty soon to be adding coral and foods.
 

JimmyV

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 30, 2015
Messages
143
Reaction score
138
Location
Bainbridge , NY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Unfortunately GHA is part of this hobby . start pulling out the hair algae by hand . if you can take pieces of rock out to scrub the hairs off that will help also.
 

Cory

More than 25 years reefing
View Badges
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
6,882
Reaction score
3,129
Location
Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
You really want it gone? The only thing to get rid of it imo is a sea hare. All the others dont work very well ime. Sea urchins work good too but require longer duration and like 1 for every 10 gallons. Other option is a lettuce nudibrach. These are specialized feeders and will prey on hair algae.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,160
Reaction score
63,517
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The options would seem to be:

1. Starving the algae, which carries its own risks for issues like dinos, but that doesn't always mean starving by N or P, but can also be in other ways (trace elements, for example).
2. Adding organisms that consume the algae. Harder in a smaller tank, since some of the best fish get larger, but this is often the most easily attained success.
3. Treating with some of the things that people think may kill algae (e.g., hydrogen peroxide).
4. Manual removal by the aquarist
 

Cory

More than 25 years reefing
View Badges
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
6,882
Reaction score
3,129
Location
Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The problem with starving the algae is usually you starve the corals too. Imo starving isnt an option.
 

skiergd011013

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 26, 2017
Messages
535
Reaction score
418
Location
Massachusetts
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
GFO reactor! I just started using one for the first time a week ago. Only had slight algae issues, especially bubble algae. My tank already looks better in general. I wish I got one years ago.
 

GoVols

Cobb / Webb - 1989
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
13,078
Reaction score
37,560
Location
In-The-Boro, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The problem with starving the algae is usually you starve the corals too. Imo starving isnt an option.
I'd be scared of getting Dino's by staving, anyways :eek: :eek: :eek:
 

GoVols

Cobb / Webb - 1989
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
13,078
Reaction score
37,560
Location
In-The-Boro, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
GFO reactor! I just started using one for the first time a week ago. Only had slight algae issues, especially bubble algae. My tank already looks better in general. I wish I got one years ago.
Love mine too :D
 

Cory

More than 25 years reefing
View Badges
Joined
Oct 30, 2014
Messages
6,882
Reaction score
3,129
Location
Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is there a huge difference in putting gfo in a reactor as opposed to a high flow area?
 

GoVols

Cobb / Webb - 1989
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
13,078
Reaction score
37,560
Location
In-The-Boro, TN
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Is there a huge difference in putting gfo in a reactor as opposed to a high flow area?
To get the full benefit, I like to tumble it, in it's own reactor.

I've never tried GFO in a media bag, in a high flow area.
 

Caring for your picky eaters: What do you feed your finicky fish?

  • Live foods

    Votes: 17 28.3%
  • Frozen meaty foods

    Votes: 50 83.3%
  • Soft pellets

    Votes: 9 15.0%
  • Masstick (or comparable)

    Votes: 6 10.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 5.0%
Back
Top