Reefledlights
Can you explain to me how 48 Cree LEDs for 365 dollars is better than 72 bridgelux LEDs for 190 dollars? I understand that the Crees can be driven to output more light but I still find it hard to believe that Crees will provide more color and par to my corals than bridgelux considering I can but double the amount of LEDs for nearly half the cost. Yes the Crees will be a little more efficient but not enought for me to justify the upfront cost.
$365 seems a little high for 48 Cree LEDs unless thats for a complete kit.
The following prices are from several online vendors:
The Cree XT-E sells for $3.40 or $163 for 48, the XP-G sells for $4.5 or $216 for 48, the Bridgelux sells for $2.3 or $165 for 72.
Given that the standard non dimmable LED driver can drive 12 LEDs you would need two extra drivers or an additional $36. Dont forget an additional 24 optics.
This makes 72 BridgeLux more expensive than 48 Cree XT-E or XP-G.
If you compare the efficiency the Cree puts out about 112-125 Lumins per watt were the Bridgelux puts out 70-80. Electricity rates are only going up and the main reason to go LED other than looks is to save electricity.
The life of the Cree is 50,000 hours. I have not found any data on the life of the BirdgeLux but do know that its design is less efficient than the Cree XT-E and it produces more heat.
The BridgeLux is a good LED and compared to other LEDs on the
market it holds its own, but personally I feel the Cree is a better overall value when all the facts are considered.
Bill