Lighting for 100 Gallon tank

Brandondavy

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a 100 gallon tank and saw a great deal for 2 radion xr15 pro G3 would that be enough lighting for me tank. Tank size 60x18x22. Right now I have not set up tank. This will be my first tank. Looking at doing live rock and fish for a year then softies then maybe getting into the hard Corals later on.
 

mcarroll

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
13,802
Reaction score
7,976
Location
Virginia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think you'd be stretching it to mount them 12" off the tank and cover 24" x 24" with each fixture.
60" - ( 24" + 24") = 12"

That leaves an unlit foot of tank...which might look something like this.
60x18_two.jpg

Plus, as you can see in the diagram, a tank only 18" wide kinda complicates this. With 80-90º lenses you can only raise them about 9" off the water before you start lighting up the room instead of the tank.

9" gives them around 18" x 18" of coverage. So you're restricted (for the sake of discussion) to 9" off the water.
60" - (18" + 18") = 24"

That leaves you with two unlit feet of tank.

Three units would give you better spread options at the more-ideal height, if it matters.

It might look something like this...diagram for a 180, but it's about the same as yours at 9"...notice there's no degree of light outside the perimeter of the tank....and as you can see from the side-view, coverage is still complete....there would be a few shady zones in the top layer of water:
72x24_1.jpg


Four would make coverage almost perfect, eliminating the shady zones in the top layer.

Four would also give you increased range of intensity...good for more demanding critters, e.g. clams, and good for allowing you to run each fixture at a lower % to extend emitter life. (Make sure you get some PAR or lux readings before you try clams....they like a lot more light than corals, generally speaking.)

60x18_four.jpg
 
OP
OP
Brandondavy

Brandondavy

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I think you'd be stretching it to mount them 12" off the tank and cover 24" x 24" with each fixture.
60" - ( 24" + 24") = 12"

That leaves an unlit foot of tank...which might look something like this.
60x18_two.jpg

Plus, as you can see in the diagram, a tank only 18" wide kinda complicates this. With 80-90º lenses you can only raise them about 9" off the water before you start lighting up the room instead of the tank.

9" gives them around 18" x 18" of coverage. So you're restricted (for the sake of discussion) to 9" off the water.
60" - (18" + 18") = 24"

That leaves you with two unlit feet of tank.

Three units would give you better spread options at the more-ideal height, if it matters.

It might look something like this...diagram for a 180, but it's about the same as yours at 9"...notice there's no degree of light outside the perimeter of the tank....and as you can see from the side-view, coverage is still complete....there would be a few shady zones in the top layer of water:
72x24_1.jpg


Four would make coverage almost perfect, eliminating the shady zones in the top layer.

Four would also give you increased range of intensity...good for more demanding critters, e.g. clams, and good for allowing you to run each fixture at a lower % to extend emitter life. (Make sure you get some PAR or lux readings before you try clams....they like a lot more light than corals, generally speaking.)

60x18_four.jpg
Thank you so much for the info.
 

Creating a strong bulwark: Did you consider floor support for your reef tank?

  • I put a major focus on floor support.

    Votes: 54 40.3%
  • I put minimal focus on floor support.

    Votes: 28 20.9%
  • I put no focus on floor support.

    Votes: 48 35.8%
  • Other.

    Votes: 4 3.0%
Back
Top