Lowering calcium without affecting alkalinity

alindell

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 24, 2016
Messages
1,054
Reaction score
597
Location
Colorado
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I have so far kept my alkalinity around 8.5 to 9 dkh mag around 1350. Everything seems to be doing pretty good but my calcium stays above 500 to like 520. Id like to lower it without affecting alk or any ill affects on the coral.

Current system is about 140 gallons. I dose 5.7 ml/min of kalk, 70 ml a day all for reef with about a gallon a day water change. Is this worth lowering? So far everything is doing okay including acros. The only issue right now is low pH which has been a battle
 

Garf

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
6,776
Reaction score
7,578
Location
BEEFINGHAM
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have so far kept my alkalinity around 8.5 to 9 dkh mag around 1350. Everything seems to be doing pretty good but my calcium stays above 500 to like 520. Id like to lower it without affecting alk or any ill affects on the coral.

Current system is about 140 gallons. I dose 5.7 ml/min of kalk, 70 ml a day all for reef with about a gallon a day water change. Is this worth lowering? So far everything is doing okay including acros. The only issue right now is low pH which has been a battle
My wife has similar dosing methods in her tank. When the calcium gets a little high, i just substitute the all for reef for sodium bicarbonate for a while. Doesnt appear that the lack of trace from all for reef makes any difference. However, i do add a squirt of DIY iron, iodate and manganese daily anyway, even with the A4R.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,236
Reaction score
92,255
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
At what amount should I worry

There’s no clear problem from rising calcium except eventually increased precipitation of calcium carbonate, but pH is a much bigger driver of precipitation than is calcium.

I generally recommend 400-550 ppm calcium as fine.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.0%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 35.7%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.4%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 9 7.1%
Back
Top