Maximum copper level in a reef tank

Spare time

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 12, 2019
Messages
12,039
Reaction score
9,674
Location
Here
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What is the maximum ppm of copper than can be detected in a reef system before it causes a problem.
 

Marc2952

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Messages
1,539
Reaction score
979
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
From what i know anything that is detectable in hobby grade kits spells trouble specially for sps.
 
OP
OP
Spare time

Spare time

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 12, 2019
Messages
12,039
Reaction score
9,674
Location
Here
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The system I tested read 0.09ppm copper (Hanna checker with gloves and cleaned with microfiber towel). The margin of error is +/- 0.05ppm
 

Miller535

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 11, 2019
Messages
2,203
Reaction score
1,937
Location
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
PPB, parts per BILLION is actually bad, so parts per million of anything is really bad. With that said, the hanna checker is actually ±0.05 ppm ±5% of reading @ 25°C/77°F , and is not very good at being accurate at low levels like that. I have seen several threads about it on here. The hanna checkers only real intended purpose is for dosing copper up to 2-2.5ppm, and is not very accurate at the low end of it's range. It is not meant for detecting low levels of copper but for dosing high. That's why they called it "copper HIGH range colorimeter".
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
66,546
Reaction score
62,838
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The system I tested read 0.09ppm copper (Hanna checker with gloves and cleaned with microfiber towel). The margin of error is +/- 0.05ppm

That is an unreliable test that can safely be ignored. It is not nearly as accurate as that uncertainty claims.

Many folks see elevated levels with it (most, I think, since so many are suddenly reporting these "levels") and when tested by ICP that is way more sensitive: none or tiny amounts.
 
OP
OP
Spare time

Spare time

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 12, 2019
Messages
12,039
Reaction score
9,674
Location
Here
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That is an unreliable test that can safely be ignored. It is not nearly as accurate as that uncertainty claims.

Many folks see elevated levels with it (most, I think, since so many are suddenly reporting these "levels") and when tested by ICP that is way more sensitive: none or tiny amounts.



The tank does have an icp test being processed at the moment so that is good. Is the hanna checker too unreliable for something such as copper in a quarantine tank?
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
66,546
Reaction score
62,838
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The tank does have an icp test being processed at the moment so that is good. Is the hanna checker too unreliable for something such as copper in a quarantine tank?

I do not know, but I expect it is suitable for that.
 

Miller535

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 11, 2019
Messages
2,203
Reaction score
1,937
Location
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The tank does have an icp test being processed at the moment so that is good. Is the hanna checker too unreliable for something such as copper in a quarantine tank?

That is it's intended purpose. If you go on to the disease and quarantine section of reef2reef, that will be one of the 2 main suggestions you will get for copper in quarantine. The hanna checker becomes more reliable at the higher end. And there are dosage calculators for adding copper. In this instance the hanna checker is verifying the dose from the calculator, and I suppose visa versa,
 
Back
Top