Milwaukee MA887 review and Issues.

Biglurr54

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
986
Reaction score
432
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a Milwaukee MA887 and I have had a lot of trouble using it. I switched back to calibrating my refractometer daily and using that. I would like to get the Milwaukee working and be able to trust it.


I have been calibrating the unit with 0tds RODI. I zero it out and then I read the RODI water and it has 1ppt. I then ready my refractometer calibration solution which reads from 36-37ppt. This is close and 36 is within the 1ppt margin of error. I then read my tank water and get completely different results from my calibrated refractometer. The Milwaukee typically reads high. 37- 38 ppt. This occurs consistently.


My other issue is that I kept the refractor meter in the basement under the sump. Its cold down there. I then pulled it out and used it and it was reading crazy numbers. All over the place. I left the sample in the lens, moved the unit upstairs where it was 70F and took readings every 5 minutes and it slowly lowered the salinity to a more reasonable reading. After 2 hours it was reading as close as it typically does to the refractometer. I know these units should compensate for temp differences but it does not appear to do that. My concern is my RODI water is stored in the cold basement and the tank water is 78 when tested. I keep the Milwaukee in the basement near the sump because that is where my storage and testing is completed.


My last concern is that there is a margin of error of 1ppt. So I keep my reef at 34ppt so I have wiggle room either way. If I get a reading of 33ppt, it could be 34ppt or 32ppt. Likewise if I get a reading of 35ppt. This is a large margin of error when we are working within a 5ppt window. Maybe all the other refractometers have similar margin of errors and I don’t worry about it because I am using my eye to make the reading, but it makes me nervous to hang up the conventional refractometer with all these inconsistencies.
 

jsker

Reefing is all about the adventure
View Badges
Joined
Apr 11, 2015
Messages
25,093
Reaction score
77,773
Location
Saint Louis
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Let see if someone has one that can help you

#reefsquad please:)
 

wangspeed

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
721
Reaction score
559
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Put it back into SG mode instead of reading ppt or psu, which are rounded to whole numbers. My Milwaukee and many others are very consistently +.002. After you calibrate it with RODI, wipe and test it with a known good refractometer calibration fluid. You will likely get 1.028. It is super consistent and I stopped using a regular refractometer because the Milwaukee is more consistent.
 
OP
OP
B

Biglurr54

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
986
Reaction score
432
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Put it back into SG mode instead of reading ppt or psu, which are rounded to whole numbers. My Milwaukee and many others are very consistently +.002. After you calibrate it with RODI, wipe and test it with a known good refractometer calibration fluid. You will likely get 1.028. It is super consistent and I stopped using a regular refractometer because the Milwaukee is more consistent.
So you use your just knowing that it is always .002 over the actual reading?

1.026 is good. 1.028 is not good.
Much like....
35ppt is good 37ppt is not good.
 

wangspeed

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
721
Reaction score
559
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So you use your just knowing that it is always .002 over the actual reading?

1.026 is good. 1.028 is not good.
Much like....
35ppt is good 37ppt is not good.

Yes, 1.028 on my Milwaukee is my reference point. It is far more consistent than a refractometer. With multiple brands of refractometers, I found that they were always off if I didn’t calibrate the day of the measurement.

Also, my bad on ppt vs SG. It’s about the same. I’m more familiar with SG units for our purpose.
 
OP
OP
B

Biglurr54

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 28, 2017
Messages
986
Reaction score
432
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Yes, 1.028 on my Milwaukee is my reference point. It is far more consistent than a refractometer. With multiple brands of refractometers, I found that they were always off if I didn’t calibrate the day of the measurement.

Also, my bad on ppt vs SG. It’s about the same. I’m more familiar with SG units for our purpose.
It drives me crazy. It's not accurate. It may be consistent but not accurate.

If you bought gas and consistently got .75 gallons when you buy 1 gallon you would not be a happy customer.
 

TX_Punisher

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 8, 2017
Messages
1,420
Reaction score
778
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I hope the temp measurement is not accurate as mine reads almost 4 degrees lower than what my Apex shows.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 37 27.4%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 46 34.1%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 30 22.2%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 12 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.4%
Back
Top