My 2-part dosing voume seems odd

mahi03

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 25, 2024
Messages
40
Reaction score
11
Location
San Francisco, CA
What state or country do you live in
California
Rating - 100%
3   0   0
For context: 80g DT / 30g sump, not sure about net water, maybe 80-90g. Mixed reef, a few SPS colonies, some mini-colonies, but otherwise heavy LPS.

3 months ago I transitioned from the hybrid balling method to a CaRx. At the time, I was dosing about 110ml of each component (BRS liquid soda ash / calcium / mg / part C).

Once I fully transitioned to the Dastaco C2, I went from 20% effluent to 100% over the course of three months to maintain Alk levels. I purchased a new CaRx to upsize, but while waiting for the unit to arrive, the Dastaco stopped working. To bridge the gap, I went back to 2-part while waiting for the new CaRx to arrive.

To maintain stability, I'm having to dose 400ml+ per day of each part. Is this right??? Initially the soda ash was precipitating out, so I attributed the high volumes to the precipitation and made some DIY sodium bicarbonate, but that was also precipitating out. I went back to soda ash and for no rhyme or reason it was no longer precipitating, but I'm still having to dose 400ml/day to maintain stability. Testing is done via trident ACM and Hanna. I'm not seeing spikes in Ca either.

This seems a little absurd, is there anything else that could be "going on" or is my alk consumption really that high? Seems a bit ridiculous for this size tank.

Corals look "ok" for the most part, I did lose a new acro frag (paled out not rtn) but that was likely due to shipping stress.
 
I’m not sure in understand the 20% to 100% comment. Is that a flow rate through the reactor?

Do you see any signs of precipitate, such as hardened sand or deposits on pump impellers?
 
I’m not sure in understand the 20% to 100% comment. Is that a flow rate through the reactor?

Do you see any signs of precipitate, such as hardened sand or deposits on pump impellers?
The Dastaco is an automatic calcium reactor, controlled by a digital/electronic head unit. The 20% to 100% is the effluent rate - it controls how often/much the peri pump is running. The PH is held constant at 6.0 via float tube. I never measured the dKH of the effluent.

I don't see any signs of precipitate - no hardened sand or deposits
 
I’m not sure in understand the 20% to 100% comment. Is that a flow rate through the reactor?

Do you see any signs of precipitate, such as hardened sand or deposits on pump impellers?
I don't know if 20% to 100% actually equates to 5x flow through the reactor but I might assume so. I also don't know for sure if the dkh of the effluent is the same given the higher flow rate. If both "questions" are true, then I suppose going from 120ml to 400ml would make mathematical sense, but still seems ridiculously high. I'm mixing a new gallon of liquid soda ash almost weekly...
 
Hiw long ago did you switch to the calcium reactor? Could corals have grown a lot in that time?

Do you know how much alk, in dKH, that 400 mL translates to in your system?
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHICH SUPPOSEDLY EASY CORAL HAS GIVEN YOU THE MOST TROUBLE?

  • Zoanthids or palythoas

    Votes: 10 22.2%
  • Mushrooms or Ricordea

    Votes: 9 20.0%
  • Green star polyps

    Votes: 5 11.1%
  • Xenia

    Votes: 4 8.9%
  • Leather corals

    Votes: 5 11.1%
  • Duncan or candy cane corals

    Votes: 10 22.2%
  • Birdsnest or Montipora digitata

    Votes: 12 26.7%
  • None—mine have lived up to the reputation

    Votes: 3 6.7%
  • Other (tell us which one)

    Votes: 2 4.4%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new