No skimmate after adding biopellet reactor

KevinsReef

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
20
Reaction score
13
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Two weeks ago I added an Aquamaxx biopellet reactor to the sump of my 56 gallon reef. Since the day I added it, my protein skimmer will not produce any skimmate. I have a Nyos Quantum 120 in the skimmer section of an Eshopps R-100 sump. I also administered 1 vile of prodibio biodigest the day I added the reactor. This is the first time I had used biodigest.

Before adding the reactor the skimmer worked great. Now, the foam/water level in the skimmer fluctuates and won't produce foam. I've cleaned the skimmer, ran Chemipure for 24 hours but nothing helps.

Tomorrow I plan on taking out the pump that is running the reactor and plumbing it into a feed off of my return pump just to eliminate the extra pump from being in the same chamber as the skimmer.

Any ideas? Had anyone experienced this?
 

wkscott

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
965
Reaction score
902
Location
Silicon Valley
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I added an Aquamaxx reactor a couple of months ago and my skimmate did not decrease. The feed from the reactor empties at my skimmer's input and as the pellets are aging, the skimmate volume is actually increasing.
Are your skimmer and reactor in the SAME compartment in your sump?
 

sawdonkey

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
2,209
Reaction score
3,279
Location
Chicago
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Did you put the biopellet output hose into the skimmer intake? I do this,and it definitely slows the water going in. Maybe you overdid it? Put it in more loosely? If not, it has to be a coincidence. I can't imagine biopellets making your skimmer stop. I should note that two weeks probably isn't enough time to get the pellets fully kicked in.
 
OP
OP
KevinsReef

KevinsReef

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
20
Reaction score
13
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Thanks for the feedback. The reactor is outside of the sump. Now that I've changed the plumbing, it is being fed from a Y off of the return pump and its output is going back into the return pump chamber. This is after the skimmer. I know this isn't what's recommended but I was just trying to troubleshoot. The skimmer is now alone in its chamber and is producing skimmate again. I don't know why unless when I had the reactor being supplied by its own pump that was in the skimmer chamber, maybe that pump was too close to the skimmer intake. The Quantum 120 is supposed to have a 2 inch clearance from its intake. Or maybe its just a coincidence, I don't know. I may try changing it back to test it.
 
OP
OP
KevinsReef

KevinsReef

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
20
Reaction score
13
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Update: With the skimmer working and producing skimmate, I moved the reactor's return hose back to the skimmer chamber. Immediately, the skimmer started producing way more bubbles to the point that I would have needed to decrease the water level in the skimmer. I instead moved the output hose back to the return chamber and the skimmer returned to working normally. What's the deal?
 
OP
OP
KevinsReef

KevinsReef

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
20
Reaction score
13
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Update: The reason the level of bubbles was changing in the skimmer with the move of the reactor's output was that the water level the skimmer was sitting in was changing. Switched the reactor back to its own pump and the skimmer is still working.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 38 26.8%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 48 33.8%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 32 22.5%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 14 9.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.0%
Back
Top