NO3 and PO4 management with dosing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vadryn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

vadryn

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 15, 2023
Messages
113
Reaction score
71
Location
North Logan
What state or country do you live in
Utah
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Jump to my question at the bottom... Here's the background:

I have a 90 g sumpless tank. Plenty of LR and sand and it's been running for years. Without a sump, everything I do to manage the tank parameters ends up in the display. It sits in a snug alcove, so I only have limited access outside the tank on one side for cords, tubes etc.

I have an in-tank refugium with Chaeto that works well, but takes up a lot of space. I have an in-tank filter/pump that runs up to a GFO reactor above the tank, and it's ugly and takes up space. I have a Tunze 9012 skimmer that's in my tank, right up front, that takes space an doesn't improve the visuals either.

I have implemented vodka dosing and been able to not run refugium lights 24/7. Now I want to remove the refugium altogether and think I can compensate with just vodka dosing for NO3, but PO4 is a problem. I don't like the look, and I dislike the cost and quirks of running GFO. I see a lot of talk, and warnings, about lanthanum chloride. If it's something I can dose like vodka and get rid of GFO, I'm more than a little interested.

Can I manage nutrient export in an established, well-stocked tank with Carbon Dosing, Phosban-L Dosing, and a Skimmer? (And 35%+ WC every 3 weeks)
 
I think it would be easier to talk about your nutrient levels if we know what your nutrient levels are, can you share the nitrate and phosphate levels please?
 
Thanks for the reply. I’m not actually talking nutrient levels but the method of managing them. Last test NO3 was 6.9 and PO4 was 0.02 - but stating them creates misdirection. What would they be if I remove my Refugium? What would they be if a shut of the GFO reactor? My GFO is a couple days old so the number is low and will creep up as it’s used up until I have to refresh it. I did that refresh at .23 a few days ago.

Is Lanthanum a more stable, reliable and slightly way to manage PO4? Can it be the primary source of control?
 
Can I manage nutrient export in an established, well-stocked tank with Carbon Dosing, Phosban-L Dosing, and a Skimmer? (And 35%+ WC every 3 weeks)

Simply put, yes. Is it the best way? That's open for debate, especially if you have tangs.

All of the nutrient reduction methods have pros and cons.
 
Well, darn. Reading about LC implementation and risks and it's no better than what I'm doing. I was trying to get the mechanical filtration out of my DT. I don't like the GFO PO4 YoYo. I hate how expensive it is, too. Maybe there will be a good GFO Black Friday deal because I'm all out.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW IMPORTANT ARE FISH TO MAKING A REEF TANK FEEL COMPLETE?

  • Essential! A reef needs fish movement and personality

    Votes: 41 69.5%
  • Very important, but one or two fish may be enough

    Votes: 5 8.5%
  • Optional... a coral-only reef can feel completely finished

    Votes: 2 3.4%
  • I actually prefer a coral-and-invertebrate-only system

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It depends on the tank’s size, style, or purpose

    Votes: 9 15.3%
  • I’ve kept a fishless reef (details in the comments)

    Votes: 1 1.7%
  • Well...it's complicated... (answer in the comments)

    Votes: 1 1.7%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new