Pulse or random

  • Thread starter Thread starter cvu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

cvu

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 24, 2023
Messages
41
Reaction score
12
Location
Foutain Valley
What state or country do you live in
California
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I have a 60-gallon cube tank and few nero 5s in it. Currently I have them running in random mode, just wondering if there is any benefit to switch to pulsing mode? This topic is probably discussed before but I couldn't find the thread about it. Thanks in advance.
 
Personally I use random mode because it’s, well, random. That is how most of the ocean is. Do the corals do better in it? I have no idea. If it works in the real ocean, though, that’s good enough for me.

There are areas closer to shore that have waves constantly moving back and forth, maybe that is closer to pulse mode, so who knows.
So my answer is… I guess I don’t really have a definitive answer if pulse mode would have any benefit. :astonished-face:


confused GIF
 
Yeah, I tried and really haven't seen much difference between the two. Just wondering if anyone has strong feelings about one vs the other.
 
I’ve used pulse myself for a few years. I don’t know if it really makes a difference but it seems to work well with my Nero 3s
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW IMPORTANT ARE FISH TO MAKING A REEF TANK FEEL COMPLETE?

  • Essential! A reef needs fish movement and personality

    Votes: 27 64.3%
  • Very important, but one or two fish may be enough

    Votes: 5 11.9%
  • Optional... a coral-only reef can feel completely finished

    Votes: 2 4.8%
  • I actually prefer a coral-and-invertebrate-only system

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It depends on the tank’s size, style, or purpose

    Votes: 6 14.3%
  • I’ve kept a fishless reef (details in the comments)

    Votes: 1 2.4%
  • Well...it's complicated... (answer in the comments)

    Votes: 1 2.4%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new