Reef Chemistry Question of the Day #244 Imbalanced Dosing and Salt Mixes

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,364
Reaction score
63,700
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Reef Chemistry Question of the Day #244

One of the primary reasons that reefers may needed to dose an unbalanced ratio of calcium to alkalinity in a reef aquarium is to counter the effects of a water change that does not match the aquarium.

Suppose that your target levels in your reef aquarium for calcium and alkalinity are 430 ppm and 8 dKH.

Which of the follow salt mix parameters, when used for water changes, will cause a substantial imbalance in the above tank such that more alkalinity than calcium is needed when dosing?

A. 5.9 dKH, 416 ppm calcium
B. 6.6 dKH, 421 ppm calcium
C. 10.8 dKH, 449 ppm calcium
D. 12.2 dKH, 492 ppm calcium
E. All of the above

Good luck!















.
 

MnFish1

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
22,829
Reaction score
21,964
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Changing DKH to PPM, and calculating the ratio of Ca/Alkalinity of the example Tank is 3.00

The ratios (Ca/Alk). for the others are A. 3.9 B. 3.6 C. 2.3 D. 2.3

The Alk of A and B are relatively lower than the Calcium for Choices A and B - So I would assume that the dosing for A and B would be higher.
Conversely, I wonder of C and D with the very high Alk and CA - might cause more precipitation - and thus also a requirement for increased dosing of ALK -

So I guess: E
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,364
Reaction score
63,700
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Conversely, I wonder of C and D with the very high Alk and CA - might cause more precipitation - and thus also a requirement for increased dosing of ALK -

So I guess: E

It might, but there's no need to invoke precipitation for the answer (and wouldn't change it anway). :)
 

Shon

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 28, 2017
Messages
564
Reaction score
715
Location
Flagler County
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hmm.. "Substantial Imbalance", "more alkalinity than calcium is needed when dosing?"..

A. 2.1dkh/14ppm
B. 1.4dkh/9ppm
C. +2.8dkh/+19ppm
D. +4.2dkh/+62ppm
E. AOA

Hmm.. A?
 
OP
OP
Randy Holmes-Farley

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,364
Reaction score
63,700
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
And the answer is... D

Suppose that your target levels in your reef aquarium for calcium and alkalinity are 430 ppm and 8 dKH.

Which of the follow salt mix parameters, when used for water changes, will cause a substantial imbalance in the above tank such that more alkalinity than calcium is needed when dosing?

A. 5.9 dKH, 416 ppm calcium
B. 6.6 dKH, 421 ppm calcium
C. 10.8 dKH, 449 ppm calcium
D. 12.2 dKH, 492 ppm calcium
E. All of the above

Let's explore all of the answers.

Before I discuss each option, I'll note that a balanced additives will add about 18-20 pppm of calcium for each 1 meq/L (2.8 dKH) of alkalinity, or about 6.4 to 7.1 ppm per dKH. The exact ratio depends on how much magnesium and strontium are being incorporated in place of calcium in the aragonite structures.


A. 5.9 dKH, 416 ppm calcium.

That puts it 2.1 dKH and 14 ppm calcium below the tank water. Both calcium and alkalinity will be needed, and in a ratio of 14 ppm per 2.1 dKH or 6.7 ppm per dKH. About a balanced ratio of increased dosing. So no mismatched dosing is required due to this ratio in the salt mix. Equal and more dosing of each is needed to offset the water change.

B. 6.6 dKH, 421 ppm calcium

That puts it 1.4 dKH and 9 ppm calcium below the tank water. Both calcium and alkalinity will be needed, and in a ratio of 9 ppm per 1.4 dKH or 6.4 ppm per dKH. About a balanced ratio of increased dosing. So no mismatched dosing is required due to this ratio in the salt mix. Equal and more dosing of each is needed to offset the water change.

C. 10.8 dKH, 449 ppm calcium

That puts it 2.8 dKH and 19 ppm calcium above the tank water. Both calcium and alkalinity will be excess, and in a ratio of 19 ppm per 2.8 dKH or 6.8 ppm per dKH. About a balanced ratio of excess. So no mismatched dosing is required due to this ratio in the salt mix. Equal and less dosing of each. Equal and less dosing of each (going forward) is needed to offset the water change.

D. 12.2 dKH, 492 ppm calcium

That puts it 4.2 dKH and 62 ppm calcium above the tank water. Both calcium and alkalinity will be excess, and in a ratio of 62 ppm per 4.2 dKH or 14.8 ppm per dKH. That is NOT a balanced ratio of excess. It adds too much calcium per alkalinity, even though it may look, at first glance, to be higher in alkalinity, it is really the calcium that is most excessive (relative to the target levels). Mismatched dosing will required (going forward) due to this ratio in the salt mix. Less dosing of the alk part will be needed than calcium to offset the water change.


Happy Reefing. :)
 

Creating a strong bulwark: Did you consider floor support for your reef tank?

  • I put a major focus on floor support.

    Votes: 59 40.4%
  • I put minimal focus on floor support.

    Votes: 33 22.6%
  • I put no focus on floor support.

    Votes: 49 33.6%
  • Other.

    Votes: 5 3.4%
Back
Top