An alt way to consider the peroxide thread here is we are one of the few techniques that set prediction and outcome dates before the treatment is ran, and then test that in the posted outcomes (still building steam here but the nano-reef one and the reefcentral one are chock full) GFO and Po4 work begin stripping the entire tank of nutrients, as the first test, and give zero time frames for reference. GFO and Po4 measures are preventatives not removers of algae, the masses use them as removers and that's why so many have to seek alternate removal methods or deal with bleached corals
Use gfo in a clean system to prevent, not to reverse set in algae or overdose is a risk.
I have yet to come across a peroxide tank who wouldn't have benefitted from the direct action theory on the tiny little initial spot long before invasion pics were posted
The rules of today only allowed them to watch that spot grow.
My goal for algae battle science is to change the way people see that first tuft of GHA, bryopsis, invasive macro, first valonia, first gelidium sprout, etc.
-the current paradigm that keeps me busy is: do nothing to it, any direct action is a waste of time as there's a fuel you could be removing but aren't. start an ID thread. Put something new in your filter. Buy some plants. Buy a retail doser of some kind. Take every action on the water except for immediate decisive control on the algae.<---- the official moniker of the last 30 years of reefkeeping and why there is a massive, massive unmet ongoing need for nonstandard tank fix science.
This whole thread will comprise before pics that are the result of seeing the 1st spot, and not acting on it. We will get full tank overgrowth challenges, but learn to see that 1st spot as a wrecked tank, I do, and now my tank is immune to algae loss via paradigm shift.