Results differ with test kits

jabx1

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
52
Reaction score
25
Location
New Jersey
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have been using Red Sea Foundation Pro and Algae Control Pro test kits for over a year.

I used these same kits about 10 years ago and thought it was a big improvement over the API test kits I was originally using when first in the hobby.

Over the last ~4 months I have begun to question the accuracy however. I was consistently getting readings of 0 nitrate and phosphate even with increased feeding and no skimmer.

I was also getting very low Alk readings, usually below 7dKh. It was the winter and my windows have been closed for months so low Alk isnt surprising but below 7 readings after a ~20% water change (Reef Crystals salt) was strange. I have been dosing ESV Alkalinity (part 1 of ESV 2 part) and trying to get my Alk & pH up.

I finally decided to purchase some Hanna checkers and they came in last night.

I only did an Alk test last night with both the Hanna and Red sea tests.
Here are the results:
Red Sea: 7.89
Hanna : 8.7

Should I trust the Hanna which is brand new? Throw away the Red Sea tests?
 
OP
OP
jabx1

jabx1

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 8, 2021
Messages
52
Reaction score
25
Location
New Jersey
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have read mixed reviews about the Hanna Phosphate ULR checker.

Does anyone have experience using this? I would like to confirm that my phosphate is actually as low as the Red Sea test says it is.
 

Sam22

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Messages
156
Reaction score
73
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have read mixed reviews about the Hanna Phosphate ULR checker.

Does anyone have experience using this? I would like to confirm that my phosphate is actually as low as the Red Sea test says it is.
I would trust the Hanna over the Red Sea any day my Red Sea phosphate pro was given me a reading of 0.08 for months and I’ve seen a thread on here with a few people saying the same. When I got my Hanna my phosphate was reading 0.4 I had my lfs test my phosphate and they also told me it was 0.4 so I chucked my Red Sea away and rely on my Hanna I use the Hanna phosphorus as it’s more accurate specially at lower ranges
 

PatW

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
2,539
Reaction score
1,943
Location
Orlando, FL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I use Red Sea Pro, Hanna and Salifert for ALK.

HAnna: Advantages - digital read out. No interpretation of end point color. Gives results to nearest .1 DKH.
Disadvantages: results vary between reagent bottles.
Red Sea Pro - reads within .2 DKH.
Salifert - reads within .3 DKH.

Salifert reads the highest and by about 1 DKH.
Hanna reads a bit higher than Red Sea Pro.

The odd thing for me is they all seem to vary about the same amount from sample to sample. I was surprised that Hanna did not demonstrate to be clearly superior. If you went by the money, Salifert is the clear winner.
 

Being sticky and staying connected: Have you used any reef-safe glue?

  • I have used reef safe glue.

    Votes: 69 86.3%
  • I haven’t used reef safe glue, but plan to in the future.

    Votes: 5 6.3%
  • I have no interest in using reef safe glue.

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Other.

    Votes: 3 3.8%
Back
Top