- Joined
- Sep 21, 2018
- Messages
- 10,013
- Reaction score
- 9,864
Have not published details yet. Experiment still in progresss.Okay, I think I understand, but maybe we had different goals.
Let's say you have a running tank without substrate and a known PO4 level. And you wanted to fill that tank with x kilograms of your substrate. Would you be able to predict the PO4 adsorption/binding based on that? Or, could you create a phosphate solution to soak the substrate in, so it would have a minimal effect on the PO4 levels of the tank?
That was my initial goal, but it turned out to be difficult to approximate especially when testing in very small Jars.
In the end, I didn't go the fancy "math/chemistry" way and instead opted for the "engineering" way by simply adding substrate in batches and countering the measured delta in phosphate levels each day by dosingIt gets the job done, but is less elegant
I still dropped to undetectable levels a few times (and still occasionally do when adding more)... Some dinos appeared but dosing nutrients and getting all trace elements back into order according to an ICP-MS test fixed the issue quite fast... Oddly enough Strontium appeared to make the difference for the dinos in the end, but I think that was pure coincidence
Have you published any of those studies here on R2R yet? Would be an interesting read![]()
The small jar approach could have worked or you could have performed the batch treatment with PO4 outside the aquarium before adding it. That would have been done at a larger scale and with ample to test. Stirring the water would have required a small powerhead.
The appearance of dinoflagellates on newly added sand would not be surprising. Dinoflagellate growth on old surfaces after adding new sand would be interesting.

It gets the job done, but is less elegant
