Salinity: DIY Calibration Standard consistent difference with Oceamo-MS ICP

djkms

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 13, 2020
Messages
372
Reaction score
495
Location
Spring Hill, FL
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Hello,

I am using Randy's DIY conductivity standard to calibrate my Hanna Salinity tester. Unlike most people I love this tester as its the only one that I know of on the market that can test to the tenth of a point.

I mix 6.2grams of Mortons salt to 182ml of RO/DI water to calibrate. I run ICP's every 2 months and my ICP consistently reads .06 higher than my Hanna checker calibrated with the DIY solution. I also add up all the elements to see if that number matches the salinity value on my ICP which it does.

Curious on the discrepancy To correct this I assume I would just add 6.1 grams of salt instead of 6.2?

My most recent ICP is attached. When I tested my water it read 35.4 but ICP came back 35.9

This is the scale I use to measure:
Amazon product

Any thoughts appreciated,
Kris
 

Attachments

  • 2026-0303 MSR230560.pdf
    208.4 KB · Views: 48

mook1178

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 27, 2023
Messages
484
Reaction score
538
Location
Lincoln
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The precision of the tester is 1 ppt. That means the tester and the icp are in agreeance if the results if both are less than 1 ppt from each other
 
OP
OP
djkms

djkms

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 13, 2020
Messages
372
Reaction score
495
Location
Spring Hill, FL
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
The precision of the tester is 1 ppt. That means the tester and the icp are in agreeance if the results if both are less than 1 ppt from each other

Valid point that I often forget with these testers, the stated accuracy. That being said it is consistently .06 higher so I may just add .1g less salt next go around and see how it compares to my next ICP. Thanks for the reply.
 

mook1178

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 27, 2023
Messages
484
Reaction score
538
Location
Lincoln
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IF it is really .06 ppt different, you are not making any difference to the animals in the tank for that adjustment. That is most likely in the ICP precision. Just because something reports to x digits does not mean that is an accurate measurement, Ie hanna reporting 0.1 ppt when the precision is 1 ppt.
 

KStatefan

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
5,589
Reaction score
5,013
Location
MHK
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Oceamo uses a conductivity meter for salinity on your results.
 
OP
OP
djkms

djkms

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 13, 2020
Messages
372
Reaction score
495
Location
Spring Hill, FL
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
IF it is really .06 ppt different, you are not making any difference to the animals in the tank for that adjustment. That is most likely in the ICP precision. Just because something reports to x digits does not mean that is an accurate measurement, Ie hanna reporting 0.1 ppt when the precision is 1 ppt.

I dont disagree with your statement and this isnt about the health of the animals. its more an OCD thing trying to get values to match if I have the ability to do so.
 

mook1178

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 27, 2023
Messages
484
Reaction score
538
Location
Lincoln
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I dont disagree with your statement and this isnt about the health of the animals. its more an OCD thing trying to get values to match if I have the ability to do so.
Good luck! You are messing around and trying to make adjustments in the precision realm of either measurement.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,230
Reaction score
92,239
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Curious on the discrepancy To correct this I assume I would just add 6.1 grams of salt instead of 6.2?

My most recent ICP is attached. When I tested my water it read 35.4 but ICP came back 35.9


I agree that you are trying to be more accurate than the Hanna permits.

It only claims +/- 1 ppt under perfect conditions

You are seeing a difference of 0.5 ppt between your measurement and a measurement at a lab that is likely more accurate, but still has its own uncertainty.

So I do not see a concerning "discrepancy".
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top