Sigma or Tamron macro lense for canon?

RogerWilco357

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
627
Reaction score
5
Location
Michigan
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well I really want to get the L series Canon 100mm Macro lens but that is about A thousand dollars away..till then I was thinking about getting a lens made by Sigma or Tamron in macro fashion..out of the 2 which would you recommend?
 
The non-L canon macro is about $100 more than the Tamron 90mm and the Sigma 105mm. I would get the Canon one.
 
The non-L canon macro is about $100 more than the Tamron 90mm and the Sigma 105mm. I would get the Canon one.

Agreed! I have the non L 100mm canon...awesome lens! Great for macro and portrait photography. Keep an eye out at B&h photo for used lenses.
 
Do you guys have some links to this lens you speak of? Also been researching this for my T1i.
 
I have the t1i with the Tamron 90 macro lens. Did a fair amount of research prior to purchase and the Tamaron is a better lens then the Sigma. The cannon is slightly better then the Tamaron but only a bit. When I made my purchase the Cannon was about 300$ more then the Tamaron.

To give you an idea of the possiblility here is some GSP taken with my t1i and Tamaron lens cropped about 800%. Those little brown hairs not even seen with human eye.

IMG_0483-1.jpg
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT MAKES A REEF FEEL ESTABLISHED TO YOU?

  • Stable parameters over time

    Votes: 22 62.9%
  • Consistent coral growth

    Votes: 14 40.0%
  • Fish and inverts are settled

    Votes: 7 20.0%
  • The tank has moved past its ugly stages

    Votes: 11 31.4%
  • It has survived a major setback

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • At least six months old

    Votes: 2 5.7%
  • At least one year old

    Votes: 7 20.0%
  • Stop worrying about age—it’s about stability

    Votes: 7 20.0%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 2 5.7%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new