Sugar Dosing

VTek

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
136
Reaction score
40
Location
North Liberty, IA.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was curious as to if anyone has ever experienced to sugar dosing. I have found some information online that suggest adding 1 tea spoon of sugar to 60g water volume daily, will help reduce Nitrates. The idea is that the sugar helps fuel the bacteria that will export the nitrate. Has anyone ever done this or had success with this? It is also suggested to kick the skimmer up a notch to help with the export.

Can anyone elaborate on the subject?
 
Last edited:

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,585
Reaction score
64,043
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Lots of people, myself included, dose organic molecules of various sorts for this purpose. There are DIY, such as vodka, vinegar (my choice), sugar, and others. There are also commercial mixtures.

IMO, sugar is not the best one to use. I got more browning of corals from it, and from the many threads I've read people seem to have somewhat more issues with it, but it does work.

Here are some articles on organic carbon dosing:

Vodka Dosing...Distilled!
http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2008-08/nftt/

Vinegar Dosing Methodology for the Marine Aquarium
http://reefkeeping.com/joomla/index...ar-dosing-methodology-for-the-marine-aquarium

Nitrate in the Reef Aquarium - REEFEDITION
http://www.reefedition.com/nitrate-in-the-reef-aquarium/

from the last one:

Organic Carbon Dosing

Organic carbon dosing involves adding a soluble organic compound to the aquarium which spurs bacterial growth. Typical organics used can be ethanol (as vodka), acetic acid (as vinegar), calcium acetate (as lime saturated vinegar), sugar (sucrose) and many others. Vodka and vinegar are by far the most popular. I use vinegar.

These organic molecules can be used by many organisms, including corals, but the main intent is to drive bacterial growth. To grow, the bacteria need a source of nitrogen and a source of phosphate, and a large portion of these they remove directly from the water. The bacteria may grow out of sight (inside live rock or sand, in refugia, in tubing, etc.). They may also grow in globs in the display tank. They have to grow somewhere. If they become unsightly, try dosing a different organic that may drive a different set of species that may grow in a different location. I’ve had them often seem to grow on GAC (granular activated carbon media) in a canister filter I previously used, allowing relatively easy export by rinsing the GAC once every couple of weeks.

I’ve never heard any plausible argument why dosing multiple organics at once is desirable, but many people do it and there is likely no harm in doing so. The idea that multiple organics drive a diversity of bacterial species is just speculation, and even if true, I don’t see the benefit.

The bacteria themselves can then be skimmed out, or used as a food for filter feeders, or both (most people probably have both to some extent, unless they do not use a skimmer). The bacteria may grow partly in low O2 regions (such as in sand or rock) and partly in highly oxygenated environments. Since metabolism in low O2 regions uses relatively more nitrate than phosphate compared to metabolism in a high O2 environment, the relative amounts of nitrate and phosphate reduction an aquarists observes may vary from system to system.

Nitrate is always reduced to a greater extent than phosphate simply because bacteria need a lot more nitrogen than phosphorus, but metabolism of organics in low O2 regions may skew it even more, and sometimes can leave the aquarium with little nitrate and an excess of phosphate that they bacteria don’t “want”. In such a case, a phosphate binder might usefully export this remaining phosphate. Alternatively, some aquarists have dosed nitrate directly to the aquarium to allow the residual phosphate to be consumed.

These linked articles describe vinegar and vodka dosing in more detail.

One potential drawback that may have played a role in some tank problems is that the bacteria that thrive when organic molecules are dosed may be benign (and appear to be in almost all cases), but might actually be pathogenic in others. That is, the added organics may enhance bacterial infections if those bacteria causing the infection (of fish, corals, etc.) are able to take up the added organics and use them to grow faster. I think this risk is low, but it may be real. If you have unexplained problems that might fit this description, and are organic carbon dosing, try not dosing for an extended period.

A second potential drawback of organic carbon dosing is the potential for proliferation of unsightly cyanobacteria in the display tank. There are many species of cyanobacteria, and some can consume the organics we add in this method. If they become a primary consumer, then something may need to be done, such as switching to a different organic compound to dose, or reducing phosphate with a binder such as GFO (granular ferric oxide).
 

Going off the ledge: Would you be interested in a drop off aquarium?

  • I currently have a drop off style aquarium

    Votes: 3 1.5%
  • I don’t currently have a drop off style aquarium, but I have in the past.

    Votes: 4 2.0%
  • I haven’t had a drop off style aquarium, but I plan to in the future.

    Votes: 28 14.1%
  • I am interested in a drop off style aquarium, but have no plans to add one in the future.

    Votes: 95 48.0%
  • I am not interested in a drop off style aquarium.

    Votes: 63 31.8%
  • Other.

    Votes: 5 2.5%
Back
Top