Tank size and evaporation

Jasper05

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 28, 2019
Messages
234
Reaction score
157
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not sure where to post this... Or how to actually word this lol

My concern is evaporation and humidity. My total volume is only about 80 gallons, but my surface area would be of a much larger tank. I have a 40 breeder display, 20 l sump, and 30 cube refugium(24x24x12)

So my question...
In theory, would a 45 gallon (72×24×6) evaporate at the same rate as a standard 180 gallon (72×24×24)?
 

theMeat

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 1, 2017
Messages
3,060
Reaction score
2,521
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hmm
Ime the biggest factor is how much surface water movement you have, followed by temp and humidity of the room the tank is in.
Can easily double the amount of evap on my 220 by increasing surface water movement
 

Auquanut

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
5,275
Reaction score
24,934
Location
Mexico, Mo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
In theory, would a 45 gallon (72×24×6) evaporate at the same rate as a standard 180 gallon (72×24×24)?


I would say that all thing being equal: Temp, humidity, water movement, etc..., yes. But that's just a WAG. :)
 

Auquanut

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 11, 2018
Messages
5,275
Reaction score
24,934
Location
Mexico, Mo
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just had a thought. With the 180 holding so much more water, and the O2 constantly being introduced and gassing off of both tanks, maybe the 180 might evaporate a bit more as the higher amount of gas exchange carries more water vapor with it. This would be a SWAG. (scientific Wild A** Guess) :p
 
OP
OP
J

Jasper05

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 28, 2019
Messages
234
Reaction score
157
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just had a thought. With the 180 holding so much more water, and the O2 constantly being introduced and gassing off of both tanks, maybe the 180 might evaporate a bit more as the higher amount of gas exchange carries more water vapor with it. This would be a SWAG. (scientific Wild A** Guess) :p
I can roll with that swag
 

Reef.

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 12, 2019
Messages
4,653
Reaction score
3,486
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I would just measure the amount of rodi water in the reservoir, see how much it deduces in 24hours.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,160
Reaction score
63,517
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Just had a thought. With the 180 holding so much more water, and the O2 constantly being introduced and gassing off of both tanks, maybe the 180 might evaporate a bit more as the higher amount of gas exchange carries more water vapor with it. This would be a SWAG. (scientific Wild A** Guess) :p

No, it doesn't work that way. The exchange of H2O both ways and any other gases both ways are largely independent. :)

If the water is not coated with organics, then flow won't matter appreciably either. Flow will prevent a protective barrier of organics from forming, which if it did, can drastically slow evaporation and gas exchange.

Air flow will matter a lot, to bring in air unsaturated with water to replace the air that has become saturated (or near to it).

Air temp, water temp, and air humidity all also matter a lot.

Surface area, obviously, is a big factor.
 
OP
OP
J

Jasper05

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 28, 2019
Messages
234
Reaction score
157
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No, it doesn't work that way. The exchange of H2O both ways and any other gases both ways are largely independent. :)

If the water is not coated with organics, then flow won't matter appreciably either. Flow will prevent a protective barrier of organics from forming, which if it did, can drastically slow evaporation and gas exchange.

Air flow will matter a lot, to bring in air unsaturated with water to replace the air that has become saturated (or near to it).

Air temp, water temp, and air humidity all also matter a lot.

Surface area, obviously, is a big factor.
Thanks for the detail. So it seems like, in my example, the humidity mitigation plan would be similar in both the 45 gallon and 180 gallon because the they have the same surface area, therefore, similar evaporation rates
 

VR28man

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
May 16, 2017
Messages
1,178
Reaction score
1,050
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not sure where to post this... Or how to actually word this lol

My concern is evaporation and humidity. My total volume is only about 80 gallons, but my surface area would be of a much larger tank. I have a 40 breeder display, 20 l sump, and 30 cube refugium(24x24x12)

So my question...
In theory, would a 45 gallon (72×24×6) evaporate at the same rate as a standard 180 gallon (72×24×24)?

I don't know the physics, but from my experience (and very anecdotal online surveys) you lose about 1% of your water volume per day if you keep
an open tank.
 

Soren

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
2,313
Reaction score
8,443
Location
Illinois, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't know the physics, but from my experience (and very anecdotal online surveys) you lose about 1% of your water volume per day if you keep
an open tank.
Yes, but evaporation surely depends on surface area? I think for the anecdotal 1% to be accurate, you would need to be comparing tanks of similar proportions for there to be a correlation.

If you consider extremes, a tank that is 48"LX48"WX6"H (like a large frag tank, maybe?) versus a tank that is a 24" cube or a 48"L X12"WX24"H (more typical reef proportions), all have the same volume but not the same surface area. I would expect the anecdotal 1% to be more accurate for the latter two hypothetical reef tanks and much lower than the actual evaporation on the hypothetical frag tank.

This, of course, assumes all other factors are the same (temperature, heat loss and gain, surface flow, volume flow, air flow, etc.).
 

saltyhog

blowing bubbles somewhere
View Badges
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
9,392
Reaction score
25,023
Location
Conway, Arkansas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I don't know it would be the same as the 180 (but I think it probably would be) but it would be a ton more than a tank with the same volume but a more normal foot print.
 
Back
Top