Testing Kits for Old Eyes...

PaulPerger

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
427
Reaction score
546
Location
Lewis Center, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am about to start setting up my first SW tank. My stand will be finished this week (enough to put my tank on it and my sump under it anyway), and I hope to complete my water change/mixing station next weekend. So, as I am getting ready to head into the cycling phase I started looking at test kits and I need some advice...

As for the basic three (CA, ALK, MAG) I will probably use the Red Sea as they look to me to be fairly easy to read (i.e. color changes are rather obvious), however, the other Red Sea kits entail comparing colors to a card and to be honest, I have trouble telling the difference in most of these types of kits.

What kit (or individual test) do you use? Especially if you use one that doesn't entail trying to decipher between 7 shades of green, yellow or some other color?

I have a spectrometer for salinity so I should be good there.
 

Dkeller_nc

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 2, 2019
Messages
893
Reaction score
1,249
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm assuming you mean that you have a refractometer for specific gravity; a spectrophotometer wouldn't do you much good for specific gravity/salinity.

If you want to avoid color interpretations, your best bet is probably the Hanna checkers, since they're colorimeters and give you a digital read-out. Unfortunately, they don't make a nitrate checker, so you'll just have to compare color cards for that measurement, or use the Triton system and send water samples off to be measured by ICP-OES.
 
OP
OP
PaulPerger

PaulPerger

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 16, 2017
Messages
427
Reaction score
546
Location
Lewis Center, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I'm assuming you mean that you have a refractometer for specific gravity; a spectrophotometer wouldn't do you much good for specific gravity/salinity.

If you want to avoid color interpretations, your best bet is probably the Hanna checkers, since they're colorimeters and give you a digital read-out. Unfortunately, they don't make a nitrate checker, so you'll just have to compare color cards for that measurement, or use the Triton system and send water samples off to be measured by ICP-OES.

Ooops... Yes, I meant a refractometer. I was talking with a friend about PAR meters, and he commented that it must be similar to a spectrometer, and I must have gotten that word stuck in my mind! Guess the eyes aren't the only thing getting old!
 

AdamNC

Lawnmower Blenny says nom nom
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2014
Messages
4,118
Reaction score
3,191
Location
Winston Salem NC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
For Alk, Ca and Po4 you can use the Hanna checkers. Ca is accurate but a little tricky to figure out at first. I use Red Sea for Mag and No3. Neither are 100% accurate but close enough for hobby grade. Other than that ICP testing, yea it’s expensive but it’s lab grade testing.
 

ckalupa

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 10, 2018
Messages
519
Reaction score
450
Location
Mishawaka
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am also in agreement with using Hanna for Alk, Phos, and Calcium - they are especially easy to use with “old eyes!”

For Nitrate I am now a fan of the Salifert even over the Red Sea - a bit quicker to develop and a little easier to read IMO. - and when you are on the low end you just change the reading perspective of the same sample and you get the 1/10 or 10X low range readings.
 

dwest

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 27, 2018
Messages
4,950
Reaction score
9,537
Location
Cincinnati
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am about to start setting up my first SW tank. My stand will be finished this week (enough to put my tank on it and my sump under it anyway), and I hope to complete my water change/mixing station next weekend. So, as I am getting ready to head into the cycling phase I started looking at test kits and I need some advice...

As for the basic three (CA, ALK, MAG) I will probably use the Red Sea as they look to me to be fairly easy to read (i.e. color changes are rather obvious), however, the other Red Sea kits entail comparing colors to a card and to be honest, I have trouble telling the difference in most of these types of kits.

What kit (or individual test) do you use? Especially if you use one that doesn't entail trying to decipher between 7 shades of green, yellow or some other color?

I have a spectrometer for salinity so I should be good there.
Certainly old eyes here...

This is the best thing I have purchased:
https://premiumaquatics.com/product...MImbqpy_v-4AIVch-tBh2szQeDEAQYAyABEgIeAPD_BwE

Agree with others about Hanna checkers. I use Hanna for ulr phosphate, alkalinity, and copper (for quarantine). I still use Salifert for Ca, Mg, and nitrate.
 

AquamanE

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
903
Reaction score
195
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

JimWelsh

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
1,548
Reaction score
1,645
Location
Angwin, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Unfortunately, they don't make a nitrate checker, so you'll just have to compare color cards for that measurement, or use the Triton system and send water samples off to be measured by ICP-OES.
Nitrate can't be measured by ICP, and Triton doesn't report nitrate.

In response to the OP, Salifert for the win for alkalinity, Ca, Mg & nitrate.
 

FunkEngine

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
85
Reaction score
37
Rating - 0%
0   0   0

AquamanE

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 19, 2010
Messages
903
Reaction score
195
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
That's actually nitrIte not nitrAte ;) There was talk of them possibly developing a nitrate meter but I haven't heard anything about that in a long while.

Honestly I'm not sure why they have a nitrite meter at all. I can't really imagine why anyone would be testing for intermediate nitrogen products.

Sorry my mistake, don’t know why I always though it was NO3. . I agree who needs a nitrite Hanna Checker?
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.6%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 43 35.0%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.0%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.9%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.5%
Back
Top