Tunze 9010 vs. Reef Octopus NW 150

The Saltwater Kid

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
Location
Vermont
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So which is better and why? I'm looking for the best bang for your buck skimmer under $200 (the further under the better...on a tight budget). I know of a used Tunze 9010 that I can get for under $200 and I've seen a used Reef Octopus NW 150 for around $160.
 
The Octopus NW 150 is crap. I have never seen the Tunze 9010 first hand so I can't say but they are not too popular in the skimmer market. I would look into the cheap sump saver skimmer offered by Luke at Reef Filtration.
 
The tunze 9010 would be better in that price range. Another to look at is the vertex in100, the Nac 6 and well you will have to let me know what your tank volume is.

the tunze skimmers are nice for tight spots. But if not needed I would look at a different design. They still work well. Just hard to justify the cost new.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

HOW MUCH DOES A FISH’S FEEDING REQUIREMENTS AFFECT YOUR STOCKING DECISIONS?

  • A lot! - I avoid fish that require frequent or specialized feeding

    Votes: 22 32.4%
  • Quite a bit, but an automatic feeder can change my answer

    Votes: 10 14.7%
  • It depends on whether my nutrient export can handle it

    Votes: 9 13.2%
  • It depends on how badly I want the fish

    Votes: 14 20.6%
  • Not much. I’m willing to adjust my routine

    Votes: 12 17.6%
  • Not at all. Feeding demands don’t limit my stocking choices

    Votes: 12 17.6%
  • I usually learn about the demanding feeding schedule after buying the fish!

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • I haven’t really considered this before

    Votes: 4 5.9%
  • Something else (see my comments in the thread)

    Votes: 2 2.9%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new