Uv or ozone

Pavo

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 25, 2023
Messages
19
Reaction score
29
Location
Croatia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Depends what you try to achive. For killing parasites and algae a large Uv would be much better choice, much easier to set it up too, while ozone is better for destroying organic molecules and making water very clear. It use much less wattage but is also much more dangerous
 
OP
OP
Rmckoy

Rmckoy

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
10,640
Location
Ontario Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Depends what you try to achive. For killing parasites and algae a large Uv would be much better choice, much easier to set it up too, while ozone is better for destroying organic molecules and making water very clear. It use much less wattage but is also much more dangerous
Just water quality in general .
 

Miami Reef

Reef Chem Enthusiast
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2017
Messages
17,255
Reaction score
29,618
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
If water clarity is the goal, ozone is the winner. It will give the “fish swimming in air“ effect. It is highly effective in reducing the tannins in the water.
 

Enderg60

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 7, 2019
Messages
549
Reaction score
520
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
In all honesty the best the Ive seen for water clarity is a fleece roller with 50 micron fleece. After that Id go carbon for removing organics and "color" from the water. If youre still having issues like diatoms or bacterial blooms a UV will work great.

With the above I can see clearly down the length of an 8ft tank.

Ozone is more for nutty people who want diamond levels of clarity or if you are running a large fish only system.

Ill probably end up trying it at some point....
 

o2manyfish

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
1,467
Reaction score
3,041
Location
Encino, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Both is the way to go. I've been running ozone for almost 40 years non-stop. Ozone is amazing if you know how to use and apply it. Whether pumped into a skimmer, using a dedicated reactor, or pumped directly into a display - You can get remarkable results with ozone - when properly applied.

Water clarity is the easy take away of what Ozone is capable of. But I have also used it applied directly into the display tank and watch large angels float through the ozone bubbles knock off flukes and lymphycistis.

Ozone removes tint in the water caused by waste. UV removes tint in the water caused by Algae (when run at the appropriate flow).

Both have the ability to kill 'bad ichy things' in the water column by the bad things coming in contact with either ozone or UV. I think ozone is more efficient at this because the bubbles or foam, naturally create a longer contact time then water running through a big pipe.

With UV you are better to oversize you equipment. With ozone you should NOT oversize your equipment.

You can run as much UV as you want, for as long as you want, and never cause any harm.

Ozone applied without safegaurds - ORP Probe and heavy oxygenation of the water - Will decimate the livestock in your system.

UV has no byproduct.

Ozone if not properly dissipated, can be released into the air. It produces a distinct smell, In large quantities it can create headaches. Ozone is an extremely unstable molecule, it wants to explode. All it needs to do is bump into something and it blows apart. So it's not like ozone just keeps collecting and building up in higher and higher quantites.

DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME --- If you suck the water out of a UV unit you will drink tank salt water. If you suck the ozone out of an airline your lips and tongue will be numb for an unnervingly long amount of time.

Learn how to use and apply ozone and you will never regret it.

Dave B
 
OP
OP
Rmckoy

Rmckoy

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
10,640
Location
Ontario Canada
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
In all honesty the best the Ive seen for water clarity is a fleece roller with 50 micron fleece. After that Id go carbon for removing organics and "color" from the water. If youre still having issues like diatoms or bacterial blooms a UV will work great.

With the above I can see clearly down the length of an 8ft tank.

Ozone is more for nutty people who want diamond levels of clarity or if you are running a large fish only system.

Ill probably end up trying it at some point....
Trying it as some point is the reason for this post .
My system is very simple . No controllers , and just a pin style timer for t5’s
 

Pavo

New Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 25, 2023
Messages
19
Reaction score
29
Location
Croatia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Roller mats are great devices, and of course it help greatly in tank filtration when you constantly filter water to 50 or so microns. Whoever run filter socks know advantage of not change them constantly with filtering 4x times more finer particicles. Over time as price drop and devices get smaller a more and more people will use it.
But it will not replace ozone or uv, they have their advantage.
You can run ozone without controller, if properly size it, use righ amount of it, on timer etc. But you need to post filter air and water after if, its not hard to set it up but its not for unexperienced begginer either. Also, not all skimmers are suited for it, if small chamber and fast troughflow reaction would be poor, best is to have ozone reactor for it, or large enough skimmer where you can install activated carbon on water output and air holes on skimmer cup. While small and filtered amount is pretty safe a contact with large doses can be very harmful, for tank inhabitans and also for people around tank, ozone is not joke at all and you need to know how to set it up properly. If you do it, then it wil help greatly with water clarity, you will not belive how clear water is. I run activated carbon and purigen media 24/7 and still change in water clarity was noticeable after ozone addition, even with only few hours a day of use (but to be honest, ozone air goes troug dryer into large skimmer column with moderate water flow and air recirculation, so reaction and usage is pretty good).
 

gbroadbridge

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Messages
5,405
Reaction score
5,607
Location
Sydney, Australia
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Considering of adding either a uv sterilizer or ozone to my 230 gal
Opinions of what’s best ?
Depends what you wish to achieve. I run both with appropriate control and testing equipment.

Ozone can be dangerous and is not something you should add without a specific design and goal in mind.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 28.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 41 33.9%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 22.3%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 9.1%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 8 6.6%
Back
Top