UV with T5s

  • Thread starter Thread starter LadyTang2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
Here's data from Jerlov. Penetration of UV through a water column depends upon wavelength and 'type' of water. Jerlov classified seawater into 'oceaninc' (blue) and 'coastal' (green) waters. If your aquarium is well maintained (water changes, GAC, etc.) your water likely resembles Type I Oceanic (the 'clearest'.) Unfortunately, his data includes only UV-A at 375nm buthe found that better than 95% of UV-A @375nmwas transmitted in Oceanic Type I water.

Jerlov UV 375nm.jpg
I don't have access to this but might be interesting..
https://www.publish.csiro.au/MF/MF08318
 
Rehashing this, I suggested to my husband we consider using one of these (others would be ATIs) to the T5 unit. What do you think? Just one bulb for a little UV! And will most of it be absorbed/wasted with acrylic ATI cover?

1604338295518.png
 
Last edited:
Thanks, what do you think of the spectrum, worth a shot?

Wow it looks like no transmittance of UV below 390 through acrlyic, am I reading that right!?

Unless ATI is using UV acrylic as a splash guard, doubt that right? Perhaps I could replace splash gaurd with glass or UV acrylic
 
Last edited:

WHEN YOU SEE A REEF2REEF POLL, WHAT’S YOUR USUAL MOVE?

  • Vote right away, then head to the comments

    Votes: 16 43.2%
  • Read the comments first...then decide what I think

    Votes: 2 5.4%
  • Vote and explain my choice in the comments

    Votes: 3 8.1%
  • Dude, I just vote...I don't care about the comments

    Votes: 15 40.5%
  • Vote, then come back later to see how it turned out

    Votes: 3 8.1%
  • Pick “Other” because my opinion is too nuanced to fit any of your simpleton boxes

    Votes: 2 5.4%
  • I usually read the comments but exercise my right not to vote

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I always get excited about Daniel’s daily polls, obviously 😎

    Votes: 4 10.8%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 3 8.1%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new