What GFO do you use?

Fishingandreefing

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
3,826
Reaction score
1,794
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am planing ahead to run 50% or less strength on GFO with Carbon in a reactor.

it seems like this is pretty popular, if you have something better, please comment. Thanks

 
OP
OP
F

Fishingandreefing

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
3,826
Reaction score
1,794
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
At BRS site there’s high capacity and the regular one, which one is more popular and why?

besides BRS, what other brand of GFO do you guys use?
 
OP
OP
F

Fishingandreefing

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
3,826
Reaction score
1,794
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So I ended up purchasing the BRS high capacity one 1.75lb for my 120g. Recommended dosage 1cup, but I will only run 1/2 with full dose of carbon in a reactor. That should last me about 6 months for around $60. It’s about the same cost as chemipure but GFO should be slightly better.
 

SeaDweller

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 11, 2016
Messages
3,595
Reaction score
4,911
Location
.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Rowaphos.

I've used HC GFO and think it works well, just prefer Rowaphos myself. If you're starting off, i'd use 1/3-1/2 the amount and check the effluent of the reactor; sometimes it can exhaust quickly if your PO4 is already high. What is it, btw?
 
OP
OP
F

Fishingandreefing

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
3,826
Reaction score
1,794
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Rowaphos.

I've used HC GFO and think it works well, just prefer Rowaphos myself. If you're starting off, i'd use 1/3-1/2 the amount and check the effluent of the reactor; sometimes it can exhaust quickly if your PO4 is already high. What is it, btw?
If you were asking my level, it’s around .35 now
 

nkyreef

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
May 10, 2017
Messages
592
Reaction score
549
Location
Northern KY/Cincinnati
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
GFO works best when tumbled. I had carbon and GFO together in a reactor and didn't get the results I wanted. Plus the carbon exhausts faster than the GFO meaning good GFO is getting thrown out. I agree with the comment above in starting with a small amount because it will strip phosphates rather quickly.

For what's worth I use the high capacity only because it tends not to break up as easy as the standard GFO.
 

living_tribunal

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 14, 2019
Messages
4,198
Reaction score
11,327
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am planing ahead to run 50% or less strength on GFO with Carbon in a reactor.

it seems like this is pretty popular, if you have something better, please comment. Thanks


None.
 
OP
OP
F

Fishingandreefing

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
3,826
Reaction score
1,794
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
GFO works best when tumbled. I had carbon and GFO together in a reactor and didn't get the results I wanted. Plus the carbon exhausts faster than the GFO meaning good GFO is getting thrown out. I agree with the comment above in starting with a small amount because it will strip phosphates rather quickly.

For what's worth I use the high capacity only because it tends not to break up as easy as the standard GFO.

I guess since I am only using 35-50% and replace it once a month, it’s cost effective. $45 will last about 6 months, that’s not bad.
 
OP
OP
F

Fishingandreefing

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
3,826
Reaction score
1,794
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Not for everyone but it works nice and smooth for me, don’t have to really do anything other than turn a light on and off twice a day.
Well, that’s why I will stick with the gfo route first. I had great success with macro algae before but all died out and can’t grow them now even with high phosphate. Then I had an algae bloom and wiped out most of the culerpas I had.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new