Whats in Sponge power

vetteguy53081

Well known Member and monster tank lover
View Badges
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
91,894
Reaction score
202,962
Location
Wisconsin -
Rating - 100%
13   0   0
There is literally no info on the product contents and for a few years, its been suspected that acetic acid (vinegar) is added to camoflauge the smell of ingredients (which are simple ingredients) but no confirmation to this
 

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,547
Reaction score
10,107
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I wonder if the expectation is that the Fe would bind and aggregate otherwise soluble things, like PO4 (and perhaps organics too). Then the aggregates might be filtered by the sponges etc and deliver nutrition?

@Dan_P found that Iron dosed to a tank was depleted pretty fast, and that it accumulated in skimmate. So perhaps it hooks up with aquarium organics too.
 

Dan_P

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
6,684
Reaction score
7,175
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I wonder if the expectation is that the Fe would bind and aggregate otherwise soluble things, like PO4 (and perhaps organics too). Then the aggregates might be filtered by the sponges etc and deliver nutrition?

@Dan_P found that Iron dosed to a tank was depleted pretty fast, and that it accumulated in skimmate. So perhaps it hooks up with aquarium organics too.
Chelation of trace elements might be the way these elements could be removed by GAC too.

Turning this around, if you could measure dosed trace elements or even just one, could you then determine whether the water has chelators by measuring the trace element presence in skimmate or it loss by GAC treatment? IO might be a control test if it does not contain the chelator EDTA. All assuming the chelator does not interfere with the test.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,390
Reaction score
63,730
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Chelation of trace elements might be the way these elements could be removed by GAC too.

Turning this around, if you could measure dosed trace elements or even just one, could you then determine whether the water has chelators by measuring the trace element presence in skimmate or it loss by GAC treatment? IO might be a control test if it does not contain the chelator EDTA. All assuming the chelator does not interfere with the test.

Copper in normal seawater is known to be almost completely bound by organic matter, and I expect the same applies to many transition metals, both in the ocean and in aquaria.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,390
Reaction score
63,730
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
What would be the proper ratio to do this?

I think that a reasonable method is to measure some tank water, and then add this at a couple of different doses, say, 1x normal dose and 10x normal dose, and see how the levels of anything rose.
 
OP
OP
Koty

Koty

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Messages
710
Reaction score
598
Location
Rehovot Israel
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
One question is how fast these trace elements are eliminated from the water column or become unavailable for consumption by inverts. Then, it seems, at least in my case, that one of them is a limiting factor for sponges (in my DT, W/O WCs) and probably for other corals as well. I would guess that it is Mn because I dose Iron from 3 sources (two-part, Seachem Iron, and coral food Seachem Reef Plus). In the case of the KZ method, they essentially keep their corals starving for the purposes of coral color and water quality. Thus promoting sponges is a kind of safety net to bottoming out parameters.
 

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,547
Reaction score
10,107
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Maybe this (containing Fe and Mn) ought to be double-checked.

I used my hanna low range Fe checker and found no substantial (>20ppb) Fe at 1x, 3x,10x, 20x, or 200x the recommended dose of sponge power added to tank water. But if I add Iron supplements from Red Sea or Brightwell to tank water, the Fe checker gives the expected response (within 10%).


Caveats. My spongePower is from 2020. No noticeable precipitation, still smelled like acetic acid. Maybe they changed ingredients. Maybe the Fe was not stable over that time period.
 

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,547
Reaction score
10,107
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
....or maybe the acetic acid is screwing with the test
right. It was a quick look, I didn't eliminate the possibility of interference.
I can also imagine that it could be possible to deliver Fe in some form that the hanna chemistry doesn't react with, though no idea what that form would be.
hanna chemistry reacts just fine with Fe chelated with EDTA, or acid-dissolved out of aragonite sand.

I wonder what the dilution for the ICP was?
I mean if the ICP was done on, say a 0.1% dilution of Sponge Power in saltwater (1mL / Liter) , then that would be 2,000x the recommended dose, and finding 40ppb Fe and 110ppb Mn would mean a recommended dose isn't really delivering any noticeable amount of either one, and they may not be intentional ingredients.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
67,390
Reaction score
63,730
Location
Arlington, Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
right. It was a quick look, I didn't eliminate the possibility of interference.
I can also imagine that it could be possible to deliver Fe in some form that the hanna chemistry doesn't react with, though no idea what that form would be.
hanna chemistry reacts just fine with Fe chelated with EDTA, or acid-dissolved out of aragonite sand.

I wonder what the dilution for the ICP was?
I mean if the ICP was done on, say a 0.1% dilution of Sponge Power in saltwater (1mL / Liter) , then that would be 2,000x the recommended dose, and finding 40ppb Fe and 110ppb Mn would mean a recommended dose isn't really delivering any noticeable amount of either one, and they may not be intentional ingredients.

Maybe it’s a placebo
 
OP
OP
Koty

Koty

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 3, 2021
Messages
710
Reaction score
598
Location
Rehovot Israel
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
The guy I got it from may have sent me the wrong test results but I doubt it.
This "placebo" works as my tank is now loaded with sponges. I remember vaguely reading somewhere that Manganese was associated with Goniopora (J. Sprung?) and Xenia survival. I just introduced a small chunk of Xenia. Last time it did not survive. I have a red Goni that was looking bad and is now extending a bit (maybe due to unrelated reasons)
 

Spare time

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 12, 2019
Messages
12,181
Reaction score
9,795
Location
Here
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Did you all check out the link I inserted? Someone sent it off to be tested previously.
 

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,547
Reaction score
10,107
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Did you all check out the link I inserted? Someone sent it off to be tested previously.
I did. What was in that thread other than the same info as in this thread discussed by the same people?
 

taricha

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
6,547
Reaction score
10,107
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I was really expecting it to be a silica based product.
I did too, I was quite surprised that I measured no Si.
But 1 drop per 100 Liters would be a very tiny amount of Si, even if it were concentrated waterglass (and it's not - smells strongly like acetic acid.)


....or maybe the acetic acid is screwing with the test

It was a quick look, I didn't eliminate the possibility of interference.
Just a follow-up, spongepower (my bottle from 2020) doesn't add detectable Fe or interfere with the Fe test, even at 100X recommended dose.

I used the hanna low range Fe checker to measure tank water, and added a dose of Red sea Trace C "Iron+" that should result in 100 ppb Fe. This data is in Blue below and shows the expected result. Undetectable in tank water, and near ~100ppb after addition of the red sea Fe product.
Then I did the same thing but with 1 drop / Liter of SpongePower (100x dose), shown in Red.
It neither added Fe nor interfered with the detected Fe from the Red Sea Iron+ product.


Screen Shot 2022-07-26 at 7.16.14 AM.png


my bottle is from 2020 like I said. Since they list no ingredients, I suppose that makes it easy to change them any time you want :)


The guy I got it from may have sent me the wrong test results but I doubt it.
This "placebo" works as my tank is now loaded with sponges.
Again - to be clear, I'm not saying my quick look is definitive that the ICP results are wrong. Just that it should be double-checked first, to see if there is in fact significant Fe and Mn in a dose. Before we take those results as fact and spend much time thinking about how Fe and Mn dosing helps sponges.

(I used it too, and felt like it maybe helped sponge growth. I stopped when I realized I had no idea what was in it, and the things actually needed for sponge growth I can provide through known ingredients. )
 

Mark Novack

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 27, 2018
Messages
700
Reaction score
704
Location
Belgium
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a bottle of this. I recently did some large water changes so its very clean and I started drops of this two days ago. Its the only thing I'm using currently (plus calcium reactor) so if it makes a difference I should see it. Polyps were pretty flamboyant yesterday. Clams look happy.
 

Reefing threads: Do you wear gear from reef brands?

  • I wear reef gear everywhere.

    Votes: 17 13.9%
  • I wear reef gear primarily at fish events and my LFS.

    Votes: 7 5.7%
  • I wear reef gear primarily for water changes and tank maintenance.

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • I wear reef gear primarily to relax where I live.

    Votes: 19 15.6%
  • I don’t wear gear from reef brands.

    Votes: 69 56.6%
  • Other.

    Votes: 9 7.4%
Back
Top