Whats YOUR opinion on Live Rock?

Waters

"...in perfect isolation, here behind my wall."
View Badges
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
8,079
Reaction score
17,642
Location
Mentor, OH
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It has nothing to do with "Knowing what to do" - it has to do with dry rock having no surface competition, not being phosphate stable, and not having heterotrophic organisms to immediately start outcompeting nitrogen bacteria. Coralline is a stabilizing presence. So are sponges, tunicates, worms, and the copious amounts of other organisms on live rock that are constantly eating and pooping and fighting on the surface of the rock.


You don't have to "know how to use" healthy live rock. You put it in the tank and grow corals.
Well I can disagree with everyone of your statements, just based on my own personal experience. In the several tanks I have set up with dry rock, i had zero issues with keeping phospates in range without using any phosphate reduction media. There are many different strains of bottled bacteria that work. Ogranisms can be added either intentionally (pods for example) or by luck from frags/snails, etc. My current tank is all dry rock, over 1.5 years old, and has 0 nusiance algae, yet the rock is covered with feather dusters, sponges, and coralline. Yes, I agree, live rock is "easier" only because you just throw it in (kind of like comparing T5s to LEDs.....T5s are easier, but both work). Live rock does have the potential of introducing pests....which is why I said you need to know how to use it (and what to expect down the road). If you have set up both types, and had issues with only your dry rock setups, then I am guessing you were missing one or several of the things you listed.....the key is to make sure that doesn't happen. So to respond to your statement, it has everything to do with knowing how to treat a dry rock tank vs a live rock tank. If you just throw in dry rock, you will end up with issues. It isn't harder, there are just more steps to ensure a healthy ecosystem.
 

KK's Reef

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 13, 2021
Messages
1,150
Reaction score
1,152
Location
94589
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Agree with most posters here. Live rock is the best in terms of biodiversity. The positives far outweigh the negatives.

But I wouldn't sell dry rock short. It serves a purpose. The problem is that reefers think they can insta-tank with dry rock, and that's just not the case. If you run a new tank without lights and seed with bacteria in a bottle for a couple of months, you will likely not ever go through an ugly phase. You just need time to let that biome develop.
 

Keko21

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 16, 2022
Messages
1,241
Reaction score
4,135
Location
Florida
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I started my first tank a little over a month ago and used dry rock. I had paranoia about hitchhikers etc. As a new reefer is seemed like a safer way to go as I'm still learning about all the things that may or may not have to be managed with bringing in live rock. Next tank (if my wife saw me writing about a "next tank" she would kill me) I'll probably give the live rock a go.
 

EeyoreIsMySpiritAnimal

Just another girl who likes fish
View Badges
Joined
May 14, 2019
Messages
13,493
Reaction score
20,039
Location
Spring, Texas
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It has nothing to do with "Knowing what to do" - it has to do with dry rock having no surface competition, not being phosphate stable, and not having heterotrophic organisms to immediately start outcompeting nitrogen bacteria. Coralline is a stabilizing presence. So are sponges, tunicates, worms, and the copious amounts of other organisms on live rock that are constantly eating and pooping and fighting on the surface of the rock.


You don't have to "know how to use" healthy live rock. You put it in the tank and grow corals.
While I agree that using some live rock is usually the best option, it doesn't have to be "ocean" live rock. I started my tank with mostly dry rock and added rock from 2 established tanks... No significant problems and things went 100% as I expected them to as far as the tank maturing.
 

Eric Cohen

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
764
Reaction score
1,054
Location
Los Angeles
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No way I would pay the $26/lb (!!!) for that Australian live rock Unique corals is selling. Shipped from Australia, then shipped domestically damp in paper, most of the life is will be dead by the time it gets to you. Of course some will survive, but you'll get much more bang for your buck buying from a domestic supplier like KP Aquatics or Tampa Bay Saltwater, plus its more than 50% cheaper.
Or buy my Australian live rock and get double or triple the bang for your buck! Way lighter and shapelier (is that a word)!

2C266DC6-8B5F-49FF-9FA5-A683ECF9B0AD.jpeg 3FED940C-05C8-4550-84EB-DA51247E2A48.jpeg 389366A4-C5B8-46C9-A657-013648C770C2.jpeg 9C63D18A-2E9D-4C9D-8F65-38AB79B08EE6.jpeg A557029F-97CD-4940-83F3-594FD4C5B999.jpeg 560BAD3D-6717-403F-A605-DF7A682AB7CC.jpeg FDA2A07D-4069-4B46-8328-BC5CD3753CF0.jpeg
 

Good trouble: Have mushrooms ever become pests in your aquarium?

  • Mushrooms would never be pests even if they kept replicating.

    Votes: 12 20.3%
  • Mushrooms have not become a pest for me.

    Votes: 21 35.6%
  • Mushroom have become overgrown, but not to the point of becoming pests.

    Votes: 10 16.9%
  • Mushrooms have become pests in my aquarium.

    Votes: 16 27.1%
  • Other.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top