Wouldn't zoanthids be stony corals?

encrustingacro

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
1,937
Reaction score
1,728
Location
Washington State
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Wouldn't zoanthids be considered stony corals since soft corals have 8 tentacles on their polyps whereas zoanthids have them in multiples of 6 and also because zoanthids are in the order of hexacorallia which stony corals are in whereas soft corals are in the order octocorallia?
 

Adamantium

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
1,533
Reaction score
1,039
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Wouldn't zoanthids be considered stony corals since soft corals have 8 tentacles on their polyps whereas zoanthids have them in multiples of 6 and also because zoanthids are in the order of hexacorallia which stony corals are in whereas soft corals are in the order octocorallia?
There is no scientific definition of LPS, SPS, or soft coral. They're just hobby terms. That said, the lack of a calcium carbonate skeleton leaves zoas pretty firmly in the soft coral category.
 

shred5

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
6,360
Reaction score
4,812
Location
Waukesha, Wi
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
There is no scientific definition of LPS, SPS, or soft coral. They're just hobby terms. That said, the lack of a calcium carbonate skeleton leaves zoas pretty firmly in the soft coral category.


Agreed.
Scientific name for stony corals is Scleractinia.
 
OP
OP
encrustingacro

encrustingacro

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
1,937
Reaction score
1,728
Location
Washington State
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I know sps and lps are not hobby terms but I always thought soft and stony corals were scientific terms. I also always thorught soft and stony corals were determined by the number of tentacles, not whether they built skeletons or not.
 

Reefing_addiction

Corals and Cronies over Crack
View Badges
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
9,517
Reaction score
35,863
Location
Aurora
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I know sps and lps are not hobby terms but I always thought soft and stony corals were scientific terms. I also always thorught soft and stony corals were determined by the number of tentacles, not whether they built skeletons or not.
Definitely based off of skeleton (or the stony part) vs no skeleton.

the way you tell the difference between alveopora and goniopra is number of tentacles
 
OP
OP
encrustingacro

encrustingacro

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
1,937
Reaction score
1,728
Location
Washington State
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Definitely based off of skeleton (or the stony part) vs no skeleton.

the way you tell the difference between alveopora and goniopra is number of tentacles
then would that mean some clove polyps would be stony corals since they make skeletons?
 

shred5

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
6,360
Reaction score
4,812
Location
Waukesha, Wi
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I know sps and lps are not hobby terms but I always thought soft and stony corals were scientific terms. I also always thorught soft and stony corals were determined by the number of tentacles, not whether they built skeletons or not.

Lets see if I remember correctly from my marine biology coarse the scientific terms .

Reef building corals are Hermatypic and non reef building is Ahermatypic.

Soft and stony are just words.
 

shred5

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
6,360
Reaction score
4,812
Location
Waukesha, Wi
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
then would that mean some clove polyps would be stony corals since they make skeletons?

No they are not calcium carbonate so not Scleractina.
Technically what you are saying is then gorgonia would be because they do have skeletons. They are not calcium carbonate.
 

shred5

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
6,360
Reaction score
4,812
Location
Waukesha, Wi
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Blue ridge coral has a calcium carbonate skeleton and is listed as a soft coral. FWIW.

That is a weird one in which I would also say it is reef building but I believe it does not fit because it is like pipe organ too because it really has a external skeleton.

But again soft coral really isn't scientific either.

Edit:
Yea I had to look it up Blue ridge is not considered a Scleractinia.
 
Last edited:

John08007

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 4, 2019
Messages
945
Reaction score
653
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
But, they don't build a calcium Skelton, when they die they don't leave a skelton
 
OP
OP
encrustingacro

encrustingacro

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
1,937
Reaction score
1,728
Location
Washington State
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I know sps and lps are not hobby terms but I always thought soft and stony corals were scientific terms. I also always thorught soft and stony corals were determined by the number of tentacles, not whether they built skeletons or not.
I meant are just hobby terms
 

blasterman

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 14, 2019
Messages
1,730
Reaction score
2,018
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Some gorgonians form calcite skeletons. Calcite is just a form of calcium carbonate that forms under low pH conditions.
 

Reefing_addiction

Corals and Cronies over Crack
View Badges
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
9,517
Reaction score
35,863
Location
Aurora
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
No they are not calcium carbonate so not Scleractina.
Technically what you are saying is then gorgonia would be because they do have skeletons. They are not calcium carbonate.
I didn’t say gorganians. Not sure how those are classified. But zoas have only a soft structure nothing even close to a skeleton
 

A worm with high fashion and practical utility: Have you ever kept feather dusters in your reef aquarium?

  • I currently have feather dusters in my tank.

    Votes: 68 37.8%
  • Not currently, but I have had feather dusters in my tank in the past.

    Votes: 59 32.8%
  • I have not had feather dusters, but I hope to in the future.

    Votes: 25 13.9%
  • I have no plans to have feather dusters in my tank.

    Votes: 28 15.6%
  • Other.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top