Algae scrubber

Terry DeMott

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
Messages
460
Reaction score
93
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a 180 gal tank w/30 clown fish I have a cw 100 scrubber I did tested today Nitrates were 17.6 and Pho .73 do I nee a bigger scrubber
It has been running for 3 months now
 
OP
OP
T

Terry DeMott

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
Messages
460
Reaction score
93
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
IMG_0442.JPG
 

Turbo's Aquatics

Super Duper Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
2,805
Reaction score
4,032
Location
West Des Moines, IA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Terry, what is wrong with the advice we've been giving you? Between Josh and myself I thought we had done a pretty good job of explaining what we think it going on with your scrubber but I keep seeing you post in multiple places with the same question.

There's a lot of missing context in this post, so you're apt to get advice that doesn't account for the issues we figured out after diving deeper into the discussion with you on FB.

Just so everyone here has this context, I can summarize it:

His tank is a clownfish harem tank with I think 30+ clowns (correct me if I am wrong)
Feeding is dry pellet food on an automatic feeder - and because clowns in a harem will get aggressive when underfed, they are well fed
He had the scrubber running for ~3 months but had never cleaned the screen
I can't recall the photoperiod but I think it was around 9-12 hours

We advised him to start regularly cleaning the screen every 7-10 days or so, but not to overclean. Having a screen run 3 months without cleaning could mean the screen might take a bit to bounce back after the first couple harvests, so it's a mature screen but not properly maintained, which is kind of an inbetween stage.

We advised him to bump photoperiod up to 18 hours. He definitely has the bioload to handle 24/7 but it's better to proceed with caution for a couple of growth cycles to make sure the screen is fully mature.

We did not address flow, but that really shouldn't matter too much at this point. As long as there is enough flow to fully cover the screen with water, that is fine. I am assuming that he is running the water 24/7 (I have encountered a few people who shut both lights and water off, which of course leads to issues quickly...so I don't think this is the case)

Make sure to clear the slot on the pipe of any growth when you do your harvests, as well as the top edge of the screen. This ensures you will have consistent and even flow throughout the growth cycle.

Regarding nutrient levels, at this point these numbers as it relates to the judging the effectiveness of the scrubber and the need to get a larger one or not are not relevant due to the past operation of the scrubber. @Terry DeMott You need to allow the scrubber to fully mature and go through at least 2 months of maintenance to verify that you are getting at least somewhat consistent growth and consistent harvests. Combine that with testing results and then you will have a more accurate set of information that you can use to make further adjustments or make a decision about what to do, but only at that point does it make sense to do so. You do not really have valid information right now to do that.

One thing to also note is that when you perform your tests can make a difference, depending on your system. What I mean by that is, for your system in particular, when you pull out the screen and harvest the algae, if you harvest too much and your screen is relatively bare of leftover algae, you might see a bump in nutrients over the next day or two until new growth kicks in and takes off. So keep that in mind when you log your tests.

This is why I recommend a "lighter" level of harvesting/cleaning for you, you will want to leave at least 25% of the growth on the screen during each cleaning/harvest. What I do is scrape the screen in a diagonal "X" pattern on each side, or a grid or "#" pattern on one side instead of an "X" pattern. What you do not want to do is scrape all the growth off completely off of both sides, because this will result in a nutrient bump - this is especially the case with your system as you are feeding heavy with a relatively "dirty" food (dry pellets are generally high in nutrients).

Also remember that there is the phosphate leeching issue with your Pukani rock that we discussed several years ago. I'm not sure this isn't still part of the problem. As I recall, you still have that rock.

More than happy to help so if it works best for you to post updates here instead of FB, do that. It works better for me. Easier to keep track of in a dedicated thread instead of having to search for it
 

smiley28

Hectorj
View Badges
Joined
Jan 11, 2014
Messages
1,460
Reaction score
852
Location
DuBois Pennsylvania
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Terry, what is wrong with the advice we've been giving you? Between Josh and myself I thought we had done a pretty good job of explaining what we think it going on with your scrubber but I keep seeing you post in multiple places with the same question.

There's a lot of missing context in this post, so you're apt to get advice that doesn't account for the issues we figured out after diving deeper into the discussion with you on FB.

Just so everyone here has this context, I can summarize it:

His tank is a clownfish harem tank with I think 30+ clowns (correct me if I am wrong)
Feeding is dry pellet food on an automatic feeder - and because clowns in a harem will get aggressive when underfed, they are well fed
He had the scrubber running for ~3 months but had never cleaned the screen
I can't recall the photoperiod but I think it was around 9-12 hours

We advised him to start regularly cleaning the screen every 7-10 days or so, but not to overclean. Having a screen run 3 months without cleaning could mean the screen might take a bit to bounce back after the first couple harvests, so it's a mature screen but not properly maintained, which is kind of an inbetween stage.

We advised him to bump photoperiod up to 18 hours. He definitely has the bioload to handle 24/7 but it's better to proceed with caution for a couple of growth cycles to make sure the screen is fully mature.

We did not address flow, but that really shouldn't matter too much at this point. As long as there is enough flow to fully cover the screen with water, that is fine. I am assuming that he is running the water 24/7 (I have encountered a few people who shut both lights and water off, which of course leads to issues quickly...so I don't think this is the case)

Make sure to clear the slot on the pipe of any growth when you do your harvests, as well as the top edge of the screen. This ensures you will have consistent and even flow throughout the growth cycle.

Regarding nutrient levels, at this point these numbers as it relates to the judging the effectiveness of the scrubber and the need to get a larger one or not are not relevant due to the past operation of the scrubber. @Terry DeMott You need to allow the scrubber to fully mature and go through at least 2 months of maintenance to verify that you are getting at least somewhat consistent growth and consistent harvests. Combine that with testing results and then you will have a more accurate set of information that you can use to make further adjustments or make a decision about what to do, but only at that point does it make sense to do so. You do not really have valid information right now to do that.

One thing to also note is that when you perform your tests can make a difference, depending on your system. What I mean by that is, for your system in particular, when you pull out the screen and harvest the algae, if you harvest too much and your screen is relatively bare of leftover algae, you might see a bump in nutrients over the next day or two until new growth kicks in and takes off. So keep that in mind when you log your tests.

This is why I recommend a "lighter" level of harvesting/cleaning for you, you will want to leave at least 25% of the growth on the screen during each cleaning/harvest. What I do is scrape the screen in a diagonal "X" pattern on each side, or a grid or "#" pattern on one side instead of an "X" pattern. What you do not want to do is scrape all the growth off completely off of both sides, because this will result in a nutrient bump - this is especially the case with your system as you are feeding heavy with a relatively "dirty" food (dry pellets are generally high in nutrients).

Also remember that there is the phosphate leeching issue with your Pukani rock that we discussed several years ago. I'm not sure this isn't still part of the problem. As I recall, you still have that rock.

More than happy to help so if it works best for you to post updates here instead of FB, do that. It works better for me. Easier to keep track of in a dedicated thread instead of having to search for it
Wouldn’t imagine he could get a more concise answer than that.
Just curious though @Turbo's Aquatics would he benefit from a larger system/scrubber?
 

Turbo's Aquatics

Super Duper Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 7, 2011
Messages
2,805
Reaction score
4,032
Location
West Des Moines, IA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Possibly but it's hard to say without knowing how well the current scrubber is working once it's mature and properly maintained (and pushed to the capacity limit).
 

Bad Company

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 18, 2014
Messages
624
Reaction score
68
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Turbo is exactly correct. The way the Nitrates are removed from the system is when new algae grows to replace the algae that has been scraped off the screen, it absorbs Nitrates and Phosphorus. The discarded algae carries away the nutrients.

If you don't clean the screen, only so much algae can grow, and no more nutrients get exported. It's critical that the screen is scraped off regularly.

I've been using vertical algae turf scrubbers for decades, and they easily maintain zero Nitrates in a tank.
 

((FORDTECH))

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
4,838
Reaction score
4,274
Location
Chicago
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
there is no more Pukani rock
Turbo is right you need to harvest the algae every week to every other week to allow it to grow more to remove the nutrients. Of coarse a larger scrubber would do better and remove more but or reheat it’s worth turbo is correct you have not been using this scrubber correctly so it has not had a chance to see if it is sized correctly for your system.
 

tgrick

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 29, 2017
Messages
567
Reaction score
391
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I have a 180 gal tank w/30 clown fish I have a cw 100 scrubber I did tested today Nitrates were 17.6 and Pho .73 do I nee a bigger scrubber
It has been running for 3 months now
What corals do you have in the tank? If it's a harem tank with anemones the nitrates are fine. In prefer higher nitrate numbers in certain instances. Phosphates? Yeah, it's high but again what corals do you have? I discovered that my scrubber performs better when I bring phosphates down below .20. At high levels, my scrubber does not seem to work at all and it's clearly oversized. I have a Red Sea 625XXL with a CW200 scrubber. I harvest, lightly every 7 to 10 days. I feed my fish about 4x per day.
 

bklynreef

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
May 27, 2014
Messages
138
Reaction score
77
Location
NYC
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Bud from Turbos is on point and is correct. There is no magic pill, clean your ats every week, feed a bit more sparingly and you'll see results. Mine has dropped my NO2 from 50 to .2 in 4 months. My PO4 is still a bit up at .19 but that's better than when it was at .49 just listen to the doctor take the prescription as indicated and you will heal.
 

Reefing threads: Do you wear gear from reef brands?

  • I wear reef gear everywhere.

    Votes: 16 17.4%
  • I wear reef gear primarily at fish events and my LFS.

    Votes: 4 4.3%
  • I wear reef gear primarily for water changes and tank maintenance.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I wear reef gear primarily to relax where I live.

    Votes: 16 17.4%
  • I don’t wear gear from reef brands.

    Votes: 48 52.2%
  • Other.

    Votes: 8 8.7%
Back
Top