- Joined
- Aug 7, 2017
- Messages
- 2,684
- Reaction score
- 3,644
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
generaly that happens when dosing bacteria and nitrate and phosphate reach zero one or the other or both. it is handy to keep some liquid nitrate on hand incase you crank down those parameters to fast I use this(picture attached)In general I don't dose bacteria. But a couple of years ago I had a bubble algae outbreak and tried Vibrant. My bubble algae disappeared after a couple of months of dosing the Vibrant... and the bubble algae has never come back.
But after the bubble algae disappeared I tried to keep dosing Vibrant as a "maintenance" dose and ended up with Dinos... however at the same time I had decided to also dose Aminos in the form of Red Sea A and B "coral food" as well as Fauna Marine Reef Vitality.
I stopped dosing everything and after several weeks all the Dinos disappeared.
Don't know what conclusion to make about the above...
I have recently set up a new large tank and am using the Prodibio Biodigest and Bioptim, dosing them every two weeks. Avoided a cycle but that also maybe because I moved all my existing live rock to the new tank with the same bioload so wasn't really expecting a cycle anyway.

Somewhat random stream of consciousness?Bottle bac sellers are also profiting wildly because there are no published articles about surface area proofing. Tales and guessing abound about what bacteria need or don’t need from us to thrive, and they have something for peace of mind $.
For example, it has been said for no less than 25 years by all reefers that we cannot instantly remove a sandbed without ramp down. The live rock wouldn’t have time to take on more bac (as if open spaces exist uncolonized unregulated by water shear etc)
If you start a poll, even 98% will claim it nowadays
It’s not how surface area works, or self regulates, the opposite simple fact is true: if a given # of live rock can run a system stand alone, then removing all incidental surface area surrounding it doesn’t weaken the filtration capacity of the remaining live rock. We’ve been fed the Lamarckian version of reef microbiology, so now we buy bottle bac just in case.
In the sand rinse thread we remove full sandbeds instantly, measuring the impacts of the same bioload now just ran by a chunk of rocks. We measured with mindstream digital, not a guess between slight green or yellow.
Reef tanks can always handle waste ammonia from common living creatures. If a given set of rocks can run twenty two fish, and we’ve only started with ten, then adding the other twelve doesn’t cause an ammonia spike, surfaces don’t ramp up. If it’s been submerged in a reef tank, it’s got total bac coverage
We measured with living fish after tank transfers for four years running, no ammonia spikes as live rock does not take on replacement bacteria when surrounding surface area is removed
The remaining surface area is either enough or it isn’t. It’s not possible to have sustained .25 ammonia, events are all doom or they are all success where surface area is in question.
Additionally, anyone here can install ten canister filters on their reef, run them six years, then instantly remove them with no harm to the greater system, and no parameter other than nitrate affected.
We wouldn’t use bottle bac in the sand rinse thread as a matter of human pride.
Paul was kind enough to provide a sample, we discuss it in his tank thread and another (I can link it when I'm on a PC)
Short answer is older tanks tend to be less diverse, while Paul's is highly diverse for it's age. I think I estimated his tank has the avg diversity of a 5 yr old tank or so. Also showed different families at high levels than in the average tank.
Paul was kind enough to provide a sample, we discuss it in his tank thread and another (I can link it when I'm on a PC)
Short answer is older tanks tend to be less diverse, while Paul's is highly diverse for it's age. I think I estimated his tank has the avg diversity of a 5 yr old tank or so. Also showed different families at high levels than in the average tank.
The referenced paper is a great read. Thanks!
I dose saltwater from the Gulf of Mexico. I am sure there is plenty of bacteria there!
Tiss true. I bet it is in aquariums that use artificial water also. I also bet it is not the major bacteria in my aquarium. Concerns with NSW is red tides, not bacteria.Yes, vibrio.
If you provide bacteria as filter feeder food, that's great.
I dosed vinegar largely for that reason. :)
Do you have data to show that old tanks are less diverse? And compared to what? I'd like to see it and the ages in years of the systems you have tested, ect. When is a tank specified as an "old" tank.
What's the diversity of an average tank? What does that even mean by the label "average" tank.
I'd like to see your data and sample sizes, ect. and the testing you have done.
Thank you for the detailed response. What bacteria products are you using other than vibrant?I've been operated my tank for a while to encourage 3 types of bacteria: 1) Nitrogen reducing bacteria i.e. that are responsible for reducing ammonia to nitrogen gas; 2) Bacteria free in the water column that binds N&P as it uses organics and is then exported i.e. carbon dosing; and 3) Bacteria that is added to reduce algae & organic detritus i.e. Vibrant.
As the tank has matured, I have cut back carbon dosing. I'm down to 18 ml/day of vinegar in a 100 gallon system. That's probably not enough to appreciably reduce nutrients, but I like the idea of free bacteria as food for other organisms in the system. I've also cut the Vibrant dosage to 5ml every other week. I have observed that this small dose helps with water clarity and reduces film build-up on the glass.