Ban in Importing suggested by WHO

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Aquatic Arsenal

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Sep 24, 2019
Messages
4,026
Reaction score
21,167
Location
Greenville, SC
What state or country do you live in
South Carolina
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
So I just saw this posted by Quality Marine on Facebook. Read through the letter and see what you think. To me it looks like it is all geared toward game animals. I know some fish are imported for food, but most of the hobby just wants their beautiful fish and coral . I honestly do not know what this industry can do to maybe change our own government minds on this topic for our own industry, but I am hoping that someone on this forum may be able to help us out. Tonga was coming in this for the first time in about five weeks. They were the first as far as I know to stop exporting coral. Please bring attention to this and tag people you may know that can help. I will start with @revhtree

https://www.booker.senate.gov/imo/m...Graham_Live Market Letter_ (002) (001)[1].pdf
 
What concerns me is the broad language used, something like this, even if intended only for game animal's, could easily include at the minimum the live fish market.

Broad language in these type of things is what caused the ban of the vast majority of fish medications available in stores here in Canada. Even though the ban was in no way connected to the use of these medications in home aquaria, because of the vague language used in the law, it ended the over the counter sales of copper based fish medications Canada wide. Now if you want those meds you have to either order from the US and pray they don't confiscate it at the border or pay an obscene amount of money for a vet to come to your house and prescribe the medication for your fish.

I hope something like this, if considered is well thought out and implemented so it doesn't have any unintended consequences on things it wasn't meant to affect.
 
unfortunally i don't think any imports are going to be coming in the near future :confused: priority first,good time to trade n share with fellow reefers,beware gouging,support your lfs if open,happy reefing,be safe all...
 
In my opinion, and my interpretation, this is a "suggestion" to the United States and will likely not lead to a ban. Although putting this letter aside, I still think it will be some time before imports are going again.
 
It says except for conservation purposes. I think one could argue, if it gets very far, that we are conserving the fish and eating them with butter and garlic sauce.
 
indo will be back as soon as safe ,hoping sooner than later!!!
 
In my opinion, and my interpretation, this is a "suggestion" to the United States and will likely not lead to a ban. Although putting this letter aside, I still think it will be some time before imports are going again.

What’s the over/under that Trump listens to the WHO?
 
Yep, thats the, " we the government, by the government, for the government", mentality that will ruin this country if it continues.
Did ya see all the signatures!
I trust them, they all know whats best for us.
They want complete control. Does it remind you of another
group/time in history?
I just hope the hobby and country opens up and stays open sooner than later.
 
Last edited:
C’mon guy. Do some research. I do agree we’re in upside down world, but not based on the WHO. That golf news is real though. What a joke.

Dont "cmon guy" me, he isnt a dr. The WHO in February said COVID couldn't be spread person to person, wheb it had been for months. They are an absolute joke. The said travel bans were racist.

Way to say im wrong amd need to research and provide no evidence. Youre a bigger joke than the WHO, and thats saying alot
 
Dont "cmon guy" me, he isnt a dr. The WHO in February said COVID couldn't be spread person to person, wheb it had been for months. They are an absolute joke. The said travel bans were racist.

Way to say im wrong amd need to research and provide no evidence. Youre a bigger joke than the WHO, and thats saying alot
W.H.O. is a joke! Hope we keep the funding cut.
 
So I just saw this posted by Quality Marine on Facebook. Read through the letter and see what you think. To me it looks like it is all geared toward game animals. I know some fish are imported for food, but most of the hobby just wants their beautiful fish and coral . I honestly do not know what this industry can do to maybe change our own government minds on this topic for our own industry, but I am hoping that someone on this forum may be able to help us out. Tonga was coming in this for the first time in about five weeks. They were the first as far as I know to stop exporting coral. Please bring attention to this and tag people you may know that can help. I will start with @revhtree

https://www.booker.senate.gov/imo/m...Graham_Live Market Letter_ (002) (001)[1].pdf
Deleted
 
Dont "cmon guy" me, he isnt a dr. The WHO in February said COVID couldn't be spread person to person, wheb it had been for months. They are an absolute joke. The said travel bans were racist.

Way to say im wrong amd need to research and provide no evidence. Youre a bigger joke than the WHO, and thats saying alot


There's a discussion forum for the pandemic on R2R, but we can definitely do without posts like this, it's a reefkeeping forum not the place for politics or aggressive stuff like that. Let's keep it civil.
 
There's a discussion forum for the pandemic on R2R, but we can definitely do without posts like this, it's a reefkeeping forum not the place for politics or aggressive stuff like that. Let's keep it civil.

The thread is about the WHO, i said my take on the WHO. That the person in charge of the World HEALTH Organization is not a dr. I never said said anything about the pandemic i commented on the WHO. Calling someone a joke for telling me to "do my research" when he clearly did none is not aggressive, its accurate.
 
Actually golf news was called out first. He is correct, the guy running The Who is no doctor. If you talk imports of corals etc... you are talking politics! No way around it.
while the head of the WHO is not a physician, he does have a PhD. He’s also got quite the resume. He’s a microbiologist. He does research. There’s been success and failures and he’s been in a position that takes a lot of criticism. The WHO deserves some criticism for their response, but saying that he’s not a doctor is just a way to deflect responsibility from the shortcomings of others. I’ll ask my orthopedic surgeon buddy if he would be better equipped to handle the job. Wonder what he’ll say.
 
WHO WHAT WHERE..rt now.. do we really want containers of corals..1the bug,2 do you really think a live container of corals will take priority over ppe..emergency equip,not gonna happen ,as thousands of corals sit wherever waiting to die???
sorry all....out
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

HOW MUCH DOES A FISH’S FEEDING REQUIREMENTS AFFECT YOUR STOCKING DECISIONS?

  • A lot! - I avoid fish that require frequent or specialized feeding

    Votes: 6 33.3%
  • Quite a bit, but an automatic feeder can change my answer

    Votes: 3 16.7%
  • It depends on whether my nutrient export can handle it

    Votes: 3 16.7%
  • It depends on how badly I want the fish

    Votes: 5 27.8%
  • Not much. I’m willing to adjust my routine

    Votes: 4 22.2%
  • Not at all. Feeding demands don’t limit my stocking choices

    Votes: 4 22.2%
  • I usually learn about the demanding feeding schedule after buying the fish!

    Votes: 1 5.6%
  • I haven’t really considered this before

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Something else (see my comments in the thread)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new