Best reef dimensions for 300G

Aardvark1134

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 2, 2018
Messages
983
Reaction score
820
Location
louisville, ky
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Which of these would make the best reef dimensions for a tank with LPS/softies, ZOA, and variety of fish including blue and yellow tang?

96Lx30Wx24T or 72Lx36Wx30T

Both come out to about the same size as the 30T has thicker material.

I can see the extra 2 ft long being nice for the tangs to swim, but I can also see the the extra height and width being nice for a big fish to turn around when a lot of space is filled by rocks.

I would like some advice from anyone who has large fish that loves to swim in a reef with a lot of rock.
NOTE: There is also almost no difference in price and my house can fit either one.
 

laverda

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Messages
2,898
Reaction score
2,134
Location
Anaheim
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
96” length will be best for tangs. Those two will not get big enough turning around will be an issue. I have a 12” sailfin tang in a 96x24x30” tank. One flick of its tail and it is at the other end of my tank.
 

Salty Lemon

Doing my best to make waves.
View Badges
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
2,903
Reaction score
16,236
Location
Peoria, AZ
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Which of these would make the best reef dimensions for a tank with LPS/softies, ZOA, and variety of fish including blue and yellow tang?

96Lx30Wx24T or 72Lx36Wx30T

Both come out to about the same size as the 30T has thicker material.

I can see the extra 2 ft long being nice for the tangs to swim, but I can also see the the extra height and width being nice for a big fish to turn around when a lot of space is filled by rocks.

I would like some advice from anyone who has large fish that loves to swim in a reef with a lot of rock.
NOTE: There is also almost no difference in price and my house can fit either one.
If you are keeping tangs, I'd go as long as you can. Both will be beautiful and I can't wait to see the build thread. :-)
 

ccombs

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 26, 2019
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
4,544
Location
Nashville
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Agree with everything said so far. Keeping fish happy with their environment is just as much about water volume as it is about usable space. The 96" will be much better for tangs to swim around. The reality is that you could get away with the shorter one, but I think the 96" will lend itself to more fish options long term.

Also, having a shorter tank is easier to manage with cleaning, maintenance, etc.
 

Salty Lemon

Doing my best to make waves.
View Badges
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
2,903
Reaction score
16,236
Location
Peoria, AZ
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Also...I have a 29" tall tank and it is a pain to place corals and clean. I'm also 5'5", so my reach isn't all that far down.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 37 27.8%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 33.8%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 29 21.8%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 12 9.0%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.5%
Back
Top