Maybe after using it, If I draw the same conclusions, doesn’t it mean the conclusions align and maybe there is some truth in the method?
Maybe other users will have aligned conclusions as well?
At best you may claim that you made the same/ similar observation as FM/ Doug etc…
For example when I used BOLUS I didn’t have the same observation / response/ results.
Also it needs to be stated that while the observation made by FM / Doug etc… may be correct the explanation is bad. Broken buffer system, little crystals, chemistry in reef tank not following basic chemistry principles, Flouride that stabilizes Iodine one day and provides coral with sun protection the next, halogens that need to dosed before the light is on etc…
Many of these have been mentioned in the latest podcast by Adam so unfortunately the bad explanations are not going away.
You know I have read this thread right?! I practically wrote half of it!!!
Really, half of it? Nice hyperbole…
From my observation there is lot of fluff in your responses but not much meat and potatoes.
Do your own research, like I did. It’s out there.
Very educational reply and it does keep the count up.
Regardless this is a circular argument that is not getting anywhere.
But you did peak my interest, what exactly are you running on your reef tank?
With so many posts I lost track. Is it Kalk, FM BOLUS with FM products and FM light schedule (BOLUS HTU), Hybrid BOLUS, no BOLUS etc…
Don’t forget I’m dosing kalk now.
I can’t go and change this or that.
What exactly are you using?
Also what improvements have you observed? As per your statement with Kalk you had great coral trajectory:
And my tank is half full of sps corals and rising……
If it was great before how do you determine it is greater now???
Maybe it is the same, trajectory is the same just different method?
Cheers,