Bumping mag up

  • Thread starter Thread starter scotty333
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

scotty333

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 11, 2024
Messages
2,406
Reaction score
901
Location
portugal
What state or country do you live in
Other International
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Guys
I’m using triton core7 be , 16ml of part 3a and 3b = .8 kh per day usage
What’s the equivalent calcium and magnesium if it’s balanced ( which it is )
Like 10 calcium . 1 mag ?
Trying to gauge 50ppm mag by increasing daily dosing without a mag kit
 
Guys
I’m using triton core7 be , 16ml of part 3a and 3b = .8 kh per day usage
What’s the equivalent calcium and magnesium if it’s balanced ( which it is )
Like 10 calcium . 1 mag ?
Trying to gauge 50ppm mag by increasing daily dosing without a mag kit

I can tell you the demand balance. I do not off hand know the dosing concentration balance.
 
Guys
I’m using triton core7 be , 16ml of part 3a and 3b = .8 kh per day usage
What’s the equivalent calcium and magnesium if it’s balanced ( which it is )
Like 10 calcium . 1 mag ?
Trying to gauge 50ppm mag by increasing daily dosing without a mag kit
How do you know you want to increase mag?
 
How do you know you want to increase mag?
Last icp was 1330 and read somewhere that torches like closer to 1400
It was something to rule out after losing 2 heads
 
Last icp was 1330 and read somewhere that torches like closer to 1400
It was something to rule out after losing 2 heads

1330 to 1400 is insignificant and will likely make no difference to any coral.
 
Last icp was 1330 and read somewhere that torches like closer to 1400
It was something to rule out after losing 2 heads

I cannot imagine magnesium at 1330 ppm, which is higher than average ocean water, is a cause for a coral death.
 
Well after seeing a bunch of brs videos I kinda listen to them since they do all kinds of experiments and there recommendations are 9kh , 460 calcium and 1380 mag so I thought why not have a target rather than a bunch of numbers
 
I expect it's something else.
Exactly. He has a new re started 7 month tank and euphyllia especially torches are difficult to sustain in new tanks with undeveloped biomes. I've lost torches also when my tank was young.
 
Well after seeing a bunch of brs videos I kinda listen to them since they do all kinds of experiments and there recommendations are 9kh , 460 calcium and 1380 mag so I thought why not have a target rather than a bunch of numbers
Unsubscribe
 
Exactly. He has a new re started 7 month tank and euphyllia especially torches are difficult to sustain in new tanks with undeveloped biomes. I've lost torches also when my tank was young.
I still have 2 of the 4 heads after I fixed my swings so think it was more relative to that
 
I still have 2 of the 4 heads after I fixed my swings so think it was more relative to that
Could be but softs and LPS can handle fluctuations much better then SPS. I think it has to do with finicky euphyllia in a new biome. I experienced the same as you early on. Now my torches have outgrown the tank basically.
 
Could be but softs and LPS can handle fluctuations much better then SPS. I think it has to do with finicky euphyllia in a new biome. I experienced the same as you early on. Now my torches have outgrown the tank basically.
All other 6 euphyllias are perfect and growing , there might be some truth in this particular torch having a short flesh band compared to the others as they were in quite a high flow
 
But! The 2 heads that were lost were on the backside of the flow so not sure that’s the reason either
 
I have an acro currently stn ing so have cut and glued it
 
Just trying to nail params so I can rule things out
Icp comes back Wednesday next week , perhaps I’ll find something
 
All other 6 euphyllias are perfect and growing , there might be some truth in this particular torch having a short flesh band compared to the others as they were in quite a high flow
Torches are the most difficult euphyllia to sustain in new systems. Some have success. Many hurt their wallets .
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT’S YOUR MOST MEMORABLE EXPERIENCE WITH A CORAL THAT LOOKED LIKE IT MIGHT NOT MAKE IT?

  • I’ve seen a dramatic comeback. I would have sworn it was a goner

    Votes: 23 41.1%
  • A slow recovery, and it got back to looking healthy

    Votes: 12 21.4%
  • It came back some, but never looked as good as it used to

    Votes: 5 8.9%
  • I tried to save one, but it didn’t make it

    Votes: 8 14.3%
  • Mine is still struggling...no comeback yet

    Votes: 4 7.1%
  • I’ve never had a coral in serious trouble

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • See, this is why I don’t keep corals

    Votes: 2 3.6%
  • Other (Post in the comments)

    Votes: 2 3.6%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new