Calcium level at 545, too high?

Texas Reefer

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
1,106
Reaction score
433
Location
Pearland, Tx.
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I had an alk swing and it killed most of my sps. The remaining sps are still showing signs of stress, but I think the worst is over. My monti is slowly recovering and I've removed areas of tissue loss on other pieces.
Levels:
pH: 8.0
Ca: 545
Alk: 8.1
Mag: 1420
pO4: .02
NO3: 25

I was slowly increasing the amount of alk I was dosing. My sps started looking bad and then I realized I was out of alk, the dosing container was empty. I did a water change and replenished the alk container. That was two months ago. My levels then were:
pH: 7.8
Ca: 547
Alk: 8.9
Mag: 1350
pO4: .25
NO3: 50

Obviously they've been all over the place and just need to be more stable. Looking back, it was in November when my alk was 7.2 and I started raising it.

At this point I don't want to change anything and let it be consistent. I know some may say the nO3 is high, but it's coming down. The high nO3 may also have contributed to the sps loss. I'll continue the bi-weekly water changes.

My main question is, though any input is welcome, do you think my calcium level is too high? It was lower until my coral stopped growing. Should I just leave it be? I've always struggled to get my pH up to 8.0. Could high ca help raise pH? Or did I catch it at the right time of day?

Id really like to get this tank level. I had some really nice pieces that we're very pretty, and I feel very sad I lost them. My BTA's have disappeared as well. My favia and most of my cyphestaea are gone. Duncans, chalices, and scoly's were hit bad too. I bought a $10 piece of Digi a couple of days ago in hopes my tank is leveling off. Also, my chaeto is slowly dying. I have the chaeto in the refugium with the Aquagadget chaetomax light which is on from 11pm to 4am.

This tank was started last May after we had to redo our flooring after Hurricane Harvey. Most of these residents and the rock came from the 120g I had. They were in a temporary tank for months while we tiled and I got this new 140g ready.

Let me know what you think. Thank you!
d2c4215d95664a1ebe9c593f4a17727c.jpg
a571ef0bd97dd78ed0016d54aaad4ca6.jpg
9294dfcdf7fac18f5842ccce922cfe4a.jpg
a10c7273457bd0445b680a38fd8be214.jpg
dce9031f2dd2d72a427df124820c3773.jpg
817458feadc075dcf23f6f5faf19a60f.jpg
6e557b4e2870835712ead117da4beb90.jpg
8e2b24f55ebedf08ff61ca41c75359ce.jpg
13bca840440cae3b2ec499ece5e9abdd.jpg
004451e94a78cd697f731714cad33f24.jpg
2ca40a9f60f1b0577c8723b29bcf17f6.jpg
 

jda

10K Club member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
14,342
Reaction score
21,756
Location
Boulder, CO
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Calcification is better when calcium is in balance with carbonate. There is a scale in one of Dr. Holmes-Farley's articles. I would not hurry to get it down, but I would get it down.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 34 27.0%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 45 35.7%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 27 21.4%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 9 7.1%
Back
Top