Possible connection between iron and RTN/STN
Many people report RTN/STN in their corals after aggressive phosphate reduction. Unfortunately, I have experienced this myself several times. However, I have observed that tissue necrosis is most severe and affects the greatest number of corals when I used GFO—even though it was not what caused the fastest phosphate reduction.
Of course, I also consider rapid phosphate reduction to be partly responsible for RTN/STN in such cases, but as a physician I also assume another mechanism that may be specifically related to GFO.
Iron has important functions in all living organisms, but bacteria in particular utilize it in large amounts. Therefore, in more complex organisms a widely spread defense mechanism against bacterial infection is the reduction of tissue iron levels. In humans, for example, it has long been known that free (more precisely, non–hemoglobin-bound) iron levels decrease significantly during bacterial infections, and there is ongoing debate about whether iron supplementation is appropriate during such infections.
Another peculiarity of iron is that there is no true excretory mechanism for it in the animal kingdom; only the rate of uptake can be reduced. (Although I could not find specific data for corals, I would be surprised if they functioned differently.) As a result, iron can accumulate—and this may be even more pronounced in an aquatic organism that is adapted to an environment known to be very low in iron.
Therefore, I hypothesize that one important component of the RTN/STN mechanism observed after the use of large amounts of GFO is that iron accumulated in coral tissue promotes (by bacteria) necrosis of coral tissue that has been weakened—possibly due to changing water parameters—especially in the case of GFO products that generate large amounts of dust.
What do you think?
Have you experienced something similar?
Many people report RTN/STN in their corals after aggressive phosphate reduction. Unfortunately, I have experienced this myself several times. However, I have observed that tissue necrosis is most severe and affects the greatest number of corals when I used GFO—even though it was not what caused the fastest phosphate reduction.
Of course, I also consider rapid phosphate reduction to be partly responsible for RTN/STN in such cases, but as a physician I also assume another mechanism that may be specifically related to GFO.
Iron has important functions in all living organisms, but bacteria in particular utilize it in large amounts. Therefore, in more complex organisms a widely spread defense mechanism against bacterial infection is the reduction of tissue iron levels. In humans, for example, it has long been known that free (more precisely, non–hemoglobin-bound) iron levels decrease significantly during bacterial infections, and there is ongoing debate about whether iron supplementation is appropriate during such infections.
Another peculiarity of iron is that there is no true excretory mechanism for it in the animal kingdom; only the rate of uptake can be reduced. (Although I could not find specific data for corals, I would be surprised if they functioned differently.) As a result, iron can accumulate—and this may be even more pronounced in an aquatic organism that is adapted to an environment known to be very low in iron.
Therefore, I hypothesize that one important component of the RTN/STN mechanism observed after the use of large amounts of GFO is that iron accumulated in coral tissue promotes (by bacteria) necrosis of coral tissue that has been weakened—possibly due to changing water parameters—especially in the case of GFO products that generate large amounts of dust.
What do you think?
Have you experienced something similar?
Last edited:
