Critique my lighting profile

  • Thread starter Thread starter monfilsi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None
116W on each of the 2 Uno v2prp.
Wow amazing what the different lenses can accomplish. With the 120 I get a nice blanket of light for my 28"x28" tank footprint not as intense par wise, and I need to use more watts to get higher par numbers. For my mainly lps tank its good. I put a couple tester sps in and already notice I will need a second light source to get coverage for where they shade themselves. I knew that though and didnt intend on sps when setting up the tank. For lps the one light would be fine. For my 180 I wanted a mixed reef again. I was hoping that 3 reefis with 120 lenses would be good, I figured it wouldnt in the long run but as I see now that run isnt as long as I thought.
 
1715528648773.png

I figured I would post my settings to kind of show the difference in the 90 and 120 lenses. I dont have the cool par graph that @monfilsi had put up though. I get about 220 at about 12" down for most of the tank, near the glass its more like 190. Sand bed is around 110-120 most of the tank and 90-100 near the glass. Tank is 28"x28"x24" inside dimensions. About 5-6" below the surface its around 550 but drops off pretty quick from there.
 

IF YOU HAD TO OPERATE EVERYTHING ELSE MANUALLY, WHICH AUTOMATED SYSTEM WOULD YOU KEEP?

  • Auto top-off

    Votes: 52 57.8%
  • Automated dosing

    Votes: 6 6.7%
  • Mechanical filtration / roller filter

    Votes: 4 4.4%
  • Automated water testing

    Votes: 3 3.3%
  • Automatic feeding

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Lighting schedule

    Votes: 16 17.8%
  • Controller and remote monitoring

    Votes: 3 3.3%
  • Leak detection and emergency shutoff

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Automatic water changes

    Votes: 3 3.3%
  • None. I prefer to operate everything manually

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Something else (explain in the comments)

    Votes: 1 1.1%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new