Did ATI change the actinic spectrum?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yates273
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Yates273

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 1, 2018
Messages
1,688
Reaction score
1,158
Location
NJ
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I am running a 48” Aquatic Life hybrid with 3 Blue Plus and 1 true actinic. I thought the true actinic was more of a dark purple almost like a black light. Mine looks nothing like the portrayal of the bulb I see online like here. It’s more like the aqua blue special. Could it be possible they put the wrong bulb in the package?

9762CF03-4D8D-40E5-929E-12653AE7CD49.png
 
ATI doesn't "make bulbs" (AFAICT) so they are at the mercy of their supplier.
Name should be printed on the bulb I believe.
What does that say?
Doesn't mean it couldn't be mis-labelled either though.
 
It does say actinic on the bulb but its
Just not the deep dark purple I thought it would be. I see Gisseman has a pure actinic that appears to be the color I wanted just to make my corals “pop”. I know they really don’t do anything for par. I just thought the ATI actinic was the same but I guess not.
 
I was disappointed with the actinic also. I went all blue plus in my hybrid fixture. I had 2 blue plus and 2 actinic. It looks much better. And the par boost is nice.
 
Actinic put out a purplish white light. They've never been really dark blue or anything. Dim, and do pull a lot of fluorescence but not like a blue LED strip . I run 2 true actinics because I love the extra little pop they give throughout the day but also added pop in combination with blue LED.
 
I see Gisseman has a pure actinic that appears to be the color I wanted just to make my corals “pop”. I know they really don’t do anything for par. I just thought the ATI actinic was the same but I guess not.
There pretty close spectrally.
atigeissact.JPG


Plenty of "par" in relation to output of course.
Depends on ones definition.
Par, by definition, doesn't include anything outside 400 to 700nm.
Photosynthesis doesn't "honor" man made constraints.
wee bit more blue/green in the ati wee bit more red in the Geisseman.

Surprised they would visually look much different.. but ???
Again depends on the lot I suppose.
 
For those complaining about the "visual" pop, this is not what the bulb is designed to do.
You will see results in corals that excite pigments in the approx 400-420. Plenty of corals can benefit from it, so you will see some corals color up to higher, or more intense levels visually without casting heavy blue/purple onto your tank.

If you want more visual on/off pop go with LED bars..........they don't have the green and red in them to balance out the spike visually.

I've used both the ATI and Geissemannn actinic and they look the same visually.
 
Last edited:

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHICH TYPE OF MISTAKE TAUGHT YOU YOUR MOST EXPENSIVE REEFKEEPING LESSON?

  • Moving too quickly or adding too much at once

    Votes: 8 29.6%
  • Skipping—or shortening—quarantine or dipping

    Votes: 5 18.5%
  • Buying the wrong equipment the first time

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • Ignoring maintenance, warning signs, or redundancy

    Votes: 9 33.3%
  • Chasing numbers or making too many changes

    Votes: 3 11.1%
  • Choosing incompatible fish, corals, or invertebrates

    Votes: 5 18.5%
  • Poor aquascaping or tank-design decisions

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • Failing to research an animal’s needs

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • Trusting bad advice

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • Doing something on the tank when you should've gone to bed

    Votes: 5 18.5%
  • Something else—tell us below

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • I’m still waiting for my first expensive lesson!

    Votes: 3 11.1%

New Posts

Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new