Sorry guys.
Was on business trip last week and havent had any down time til this morning.
I wasn't trying to lead anyone reading that AA doesnt do "anything" in a sense that the coral rejects AA. We know they use it for growth.
It is also a form of nitrogen they will photosynthesize if other forms are unavailable.
my point was that it does nothing meaningful to the aquarist. Maybe we can link lack of AA to rtn or stn but we cant measure it.
Also before and afters show nothing. You would figure after years of a product on the market, we would get more than "more cyano" to show for it.
Another thing to note: There are no signs of AA shortage in our tank naturally. It almost reminds me of potassium. Sure corals use it, but how little is too little before corals kick the bucket? We can at least measure that.
@Kungpaoshizi mentioned new methods for reefing.
Hey. im all for that. Prescribing carbon dosing for my tank would wipe the entire lot out. However, i do dose nitrate and phosphate regularly, which aligns to "newer" or should i say "advanced" methods of reefing.
At the end of the day... a tried and true method for almost anything that ails an aquarist is a water change. (unfortunately there is no 5ppm nitrate blend). why? because we have limited means to test our water short of the basics.
If your corals look angry after one of those, chances are nutrients are gone, or the mix is off.
Of course im speaking generally because this topic hasnt seemed to nail down a "specific" beyond blanket water params via AA concentrations they cant test for.
my .02
personally: you all know how i feel about bottled AA, so there is no need for sarcastic devil's advocate prodding.