Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
120: 48"x24"x24"What size tank?
Thanks I've seen these illustrations you did in an other thread. And as your theory is quite convincing I believe that the prices don't justify doing that. One Xr15 pro is 399, x3=$1197. Two Xr30 pros at 750x2=$1500. For the same number of pucks 4Xr15 would cost $1596. So would I probably be okay with 3 xr15? Probably would, but when I'm looking at the value of lighting I would essentially be saving $100 on the 4th puck if I went with the xr30s. Then of course is the argument of whether or not the pro models are necessary or not. This has been the battle in my mind for a couple months as I compile my equipment.Nothing about a 120 demands the intensity of the bigger XR30's and there are other factors that may be more important depending...
Check out these diagrams I designed just to illustrate the different coverage between two and four fixtures. For reference, these diagrams are hypothetically Radeon's mounted at the correct height for a 120 so that there's minimal or zero light-spill outside the tank.
It's pretty clear that two leaves a lot of gaps....and people get surprised by this for some reason and end up adding T5's or other auxilliary lights to make up for it.
YMMV....old-school halide lovers will probably see the coverage of two as a bit more normal....but even that depends what you're used to:
I think I'd at least consider XR15's and going with more units - at least three.
Thanks for your input. I too have been having a hard time finding much in the way of anecdotal information. What info I have seen is from Orphek's web site. Let's be honest though I have not heard of any other hobby lighting company that is producing fixtures for both the hobbyist and public aquariums. That speaks a lot for their tech. I just haven't seen enough yet to completely sway my decision.It is likely you won't find many with Orphek lighting experiences. From what I have read so far they are the Best . It's like the difference between Ferrari (Orphek) and BMW(pro3). You won't go wrong with Either. If the price is close, It's Orphek hands done. Just IMO that's the way the Data is going for me. Happy researching.
Thanks I've seen these illustrations you did in an other thread. And as your theory is quite convincing I believe that the prices don't justify doing that. One Xr15 pro is 399, x3=$1197. Two Xr30 pros at 750x2=$1500. For the same number of pucks 4Xr15 would cost $1596. So would I probably be okay with 3 xr15? Probably would, but when I'm looking at the value of lighting I would essentially be saving $100 on the 4th puck if I went with the xr30s. Then of course is the argument of whether or not the pro models are necessary or not. This has been the battle in my mind for a couple months as I compile my equipment.
I have not seen some one switch one lens, it was just an idea I had. I don't see why it wouldn't work, one wide angle lens on each fixture seems sensible in my mind, but your right maybe not do what I think.I will admit I'm not as familiar with the user-oriented features between them (AI vs Ecotech), but from what I know they all seemed pretty identical. (Certainly so from the coral's perspective...)
Have you seen someone switch only one lens on an XR30 like that?
I'm not sure a one-lens upgrade is going to do what you think it is.
Todd, do you have a build thread so I can see some pics of those fixtures?I like the fact that Orphek produces their own chips
No chip failures on my end!
I have not seen some one switch one lens, it was just an idea I had. I don't see why it wouldn't work, one wide angle lens on each fixture seems sensible in my mind, but your right maybe not do what I think.
And what is your analysis on these fixtures. I've seen you recommend them to other people. I emailed Scott, and he thinks for my application 2 V3 compacts would be best. Price is comparable to Radions. I've been searching for reviews online, but all I can find are videos of Scott at MACNA doing interviews. I can't seem to find any reviews by actual users, well that are in English any way.
I've used T5, and then switched to LED. My last fixture was a DIY set up from Rapid LED. I've thought about adding to it to save money, however have decided against it. For my current build it is being required (the wife) to have a much cleaner polished look. Also I can use that set up on the 40breeder that I made it for which is going to be my refugium.I don't think it's a question of "won't work" but of "$800 for a hack?"
The only instance I can think of this on a commercial fixture was the old AI Sol's that had 40º and 70º lenses, if I recall correctly. Roughly the same idea on paper: to get the best of both lenses. They don't do it anymore either, so I don't think it works out as well as you might think....just adding 2+2 though....YMMV. I'd certainly try it if you're willing to pony up for the extra Radeon as well as the extra lenses.
At that $$$, however, I seriously think I'd consider spreading out your emitters instead by going XR15 Pro or Hydra 26HD. Depending on tastes, I think this is the better solution in terms of addressing spread of light in the tank.
You kinda winced at the extra few bucks of the XR15 route, but it doesn't seem like you're all that budget sensitive in the final analysis. I think I'd look at that and the Hydra option some more and then sleep on them.
BTW, what lights are you used to using in the past - your pre-LED preference? Halide? T5? A combo? (I mean for preference on a a single tank and fixture....not what your whole lighting experience is.)