Excess Lanthanum

kzp

Community Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 21, 2019
Messages
64
Reaction score
51
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
An interesting thought. Yesterday I moved over my dosing tube to dose into the body of the skimmer. I brought the dosing line in through the lid and then used a section of rigid tubing to drop the outlet down the neck into the skimmer body.
Any word yet on your Lanthanum levels and phosphate levels since dosing into the skimmer neck? I dose Phosphate RX (also lanthanum based) into my Clarisea roller filter. My thought is that even with filtering down to 50 mcg (or 25 mcg in the case of the Clarisea), the fleece is continually partially clogged with waste, so we may actually be filtering out more of the Lanthanum than we would assume to be doing with our 25-50 mcg fleece filtering ratings. Furthermore, are we even sure that Lanthanum is harmful to our corals? I'm dosing a very small amount of Lanthanum/day via a dosing pump, which is working very well for me in keeping down my phosphates. My lanthanum level as per ICP (literally run today) was .024 PPM, which is slightly higher than "Fiji" water levels (.007 ppm). Should I be worried?
 

csb123

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
779
Reaction score
765
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I use LaCl daily, and only one Triton test showed an excess. It’s my opinion that the test got some Lanathum phosphate precipitate in it. The ICP process involves superheating the sample until the elements dissociate. So, I think, unless you dosed it immediately before taking the sample, there was no excess reactive Lanathum ion.

As to preventing cloudiness when dosing, just drip it in slowly. Mechanical filtration will help, and any leftovers end up as detritus. I drip mine into the skimmer.
 
OP
OP
LobsterOfJustice

LobsterOfJustice

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
1,458
Reaction score
1,479
Location
Cary, NC
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
19 Jan - PO4 0.03
27 Jan - Moved dosing tube into skimmer, added diatom filter to sump (to catch stray precipitate)
01 Feb - PO4 0.04, cut LaCl dose by 1/3, 40% water change
06 Feb - PO4 0.05, turned off LaCl dose & introduced Chaeto to system
08 Feb - PO4 0.04, 40 % water change

I am going to test PO4 again today and perform a third 40% water change on Saturday, and then will send in another ICP test.

In terms of a little more detail as to issues I was having - SPS both burned at tips (colonies) and tissue peeling at base/RTN (frags). I lost all copepods & amphipods (gammarus shrimp), anemone crab, hermits (I had ~250). Soft corals (mushrooms, yellow polyps) and anemones shrunk in size. Chaeto died. I thought I had lost my micro brittle star population, but now that I have performed some water changes I am beginning to see their legs sticking back out of the LR again. I cant say for sure the La was the issue, but it was the only thing that stood out on the ICP test. Things seem to be looking better after the two 40% water changes, I can just barely see the SPS with burned tips beginning to regrow at those areas, and the softies and anemones are opening back up.
 
OP
OP
LobsterOfJustice

LobsterOfJustice

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
1,458
Reaction score
1,479
Location
Cary, NC
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
My updated triton test came back with 6.8 ug/L which almost perfectly aligns with the calculated expected value after 3 40% water changes and a starting value of 31 ug/L. So, I trust the reading, and to me it is confirmed that I am actually dealing with free La in the water as opposed to precipitate (since I stopped dosing La several weeks prior to sending this sample in, and have been running a diatom filter since then).

6.8 ug/L still registers as a high value, so I will continue with regular smaller water changes to slowly finish bringing the level down. The tank has already improved dramatically - coral color and tissue texture has returned, corals are regrowing over dead areas, and alkalinity uptake has jumped. I introduced some Chaeto maybe 2 weeks ago and it has probably quadrupled in size since then, and PO4 levels remain in my typical range. I am now working on re establishing microbial and pod diversity as well as restocking my CUC.
 

dankaqua

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 9, 2020
Messages
167
Reaction score
106
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
It sounds like proof positive that there was a Lanthanum buildup in your system and that was harming your reef's inhabitants. Glad that water changes and ending the LaCl dosing fixed the problem.

Also great to hear that your phosphate levels are stable (and low) by growing Chaeto. I recall that your reason to use LaCl was to be able to accurately control phosphate levels (where using GFO would lead to a big drop and slow rise when the media was changed out). Since Chaeto is a growing/photosynthesizing/nutrient uptake organism, it should naturally react to changes in available nutrients, and you can "dial in" nutrient uptake with photo period and light intensity.

...curious as to whether dosing LaCl into a skimmer mitigates the buildup issue?... maybe there is more to dosing LaCl into skimmer foam than we currently understand?
 

CoralWealth

2500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Nov 13, 2016
Messages
4,328
Reaction score
2,253
Location
Allentown PA
Rating - 100%
20   0   0
My updated triton test came back with 6.8 ug/L which almost perfectly aligns with the calculated expected value after 3 40% water changes and a starting value of 31 ug/L. So, I trust the reading, and to me it is confirmed that I am actually dealing with free La in the water as opposed to precipitate (since I stopped dosing La several weeks prior to sending this sample in, and have been running a diatom filter since then).

6.8 ug/L still registers as a high value, so I will continue with regular smaller water changes to slowly finish bringing the level down. The tank has already improved dramatically - coral color and tissue texture has returned, corals are regrowing over dead areas, and alkalinity uptake has jumped. I introduced some Chaeto maybe 2 weeks ago and it has probably quadrupled in size since then, and PO4 levels remain in my typical range. I am now working on re establishing microbial and pod diversity as well as restocking my CUC.


how is this now? my Lanthanum tested at 9 and i use phosphate rx
 
OP
OP
LobsterOfJustice

LobsterOfJustice

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
1,458
Reaction score
1,479
Location
Cary, NC
Rating - 100%
2   0   0
Hey all, for anyone still interested... (@dankaqua, @kzp)

I'm approaching the 2 year mark following up on this situation. After stopping the LaCl and introducing Chaeto into the system I was able to keep nitrates and phosphates in line for ~18 months. As usual, at some point a few months ago the chaeto died off and I began having issues controlling nutrients again. I found an old bottle of phosphat-E and hooked it up to a peri pump (had to reference back to this thread to find my dosing) and this time had it dose into the skimmer neck. Within weeks my phosphates were back at acceptable levels. But... after a few months I began to see base recession on some SPS corals. Sent in an ICP test and La levels are elevated again. So to answer the question of dosing into the skimmer neck - does NOT mitigate the issue, at least in my system.
 

GSnake

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
640
Reaction score
265
Location
Ontario
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hey all, for anyone still interested... (@dankaqua, @kzp)

I'm approaching the 2 year mark following up on this situation. After stopping the LaCl and introducing Chaeto into the system I was able to keep nitrates and phosphates in line for ~18 months. As usual, at some point a few months ago the chaeto died off and I began having issues controlling nutrients again. I found an old bottle of phosphat-E and hooked it up to a peri pump (had to reference back to this thread to find my dosing) and this time had it dose into the skimmer neck. Within weeks my phosphates were back at acceptable levels. But... after a few months I began to see base recession on some SPS corals. Sent in an ICP test and La levels are elevated again. So to answer the question of dosing into the skimmer neck - does NOT mitigate the issue, at least in my system.
I've dosed lacl into skimmer neck for months now, 6?. I also got lanthanum on my ICP at around 48ug and am looking into it, how I found this thread. I do not however have recession on my sos, though I feed a lot and use coral foods / aminos / traces too. What have you done since
 
Last edited:

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,849
Reaction score
93,516
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've dosed lacl into skimmer neck for months now, 6?. I also got lanthanum on my ICP at around 48ug and am looking into it, how I found this thread. I do not however have recession on my sos, though I feed a lot and use coral foods / aminos / traces too. What have you done since

Do you still have significant phosphate?
 

GSnake

Well-Known Member
View Badges
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
640
Reaction score
265
Location
Ontario
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I've dosed lacl into skimmer neck for months now, 6?. I also got lanthanum on my ICP at around 48ug and am looking into it, how I found this thread. I do not however have recession on my sos, though I feed a lot and use coral foods / aminos / traces too. What have you done since

Do you still have significant phosphate?
I went from .6 when I started to .1 now, and it's pretty stable at .1 for 2-3 months, I use 3 ml of phosban L to get it to stay here

I haven't made much much of attempt to get it lower cause it doesn't bind effectively at .05 and under right?
 

Miami Reef

Reef Chem Enthusiast
View Badges
Joined
Sep 8, 2017
Messages
17,255
Reaction score
29,642
Location
Miami
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
I went from .6 when I started to .1 now, and it's pretty stable at .1 for 2-3 months, I use 3 ml of phosban L to get it to stay here

I haven't made much much of attempt to get it lower cause it doesn't bind effectively at .05 and under right?
Lanthanum can easily take phosphate down to undetectable levels. However, the lower the phosphate, the higher potential for free lanthanum. It can also precipitate with carbonate (alkalinity), so free forms shouldn’t last indefinitely.
 

BryanM

7500 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Jun 27, 2024
Messages
8,074
Reaction score
9,952
Location
Morgan Hill
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I dose Lanthanum Chloride to manage phosphate. I am having some trouble with corals and a Triton test came back with very high levels of Lanthanum.

I currently dose into my Rollermat, but maybe that is not catching enough precipitate? Or is this different because it’s dissolved? How can I stop this from happening? I am happy with my PO4 management so would like to continue using LaCl but just want to find a way to stop it from ending up dissolved at elevated levels in the water.

And, how can I get rid of the Lanthanum that is currently present? Detox, Cuprisorb, polyfilter?
First, love the name :)

I know gfo isn;t cheap, but I switched due to LC issues. Why not just switch to a different export method?
 

MBruun

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
202
Reaction score
190
Location
Denmark
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
How come that not all LC binds to phosphate (or carbonate) and precipitate and turn into "free LC" ?
If the inorganic phosphate level are above 0.1 I would expect all LC to react with the phosphate and precipitate. I know it doesn't but why ?
I assume that the LC measured by ICP-MS is free LC that are not precipitated to anything.
 

Randy Holmes-Farley

Reef Chemist
View Badges
Joined
Sep 5, 2014
Messages
89,849
Reaction score
93,516
Location
Massachusetts, United States
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
How come that not all LC binds to phosphate (or carbonate) and precipitate and turn into "free LC" ?
If the inorganic phosphate level are above 0.1 I would expect all LC to react with the phosphate and precipitate. I know it doesn't but why ?
I assume that the LC measured by ICP-MS is free LC that are not precipitated to anything.
I’m not sure why the op shows lanthanum or if it is accurate, or if accurate, whether it is any concern.

Both lanthanum and phosphate will be present at some level, as they both are in the ocean, but I do not know if any reason for the op to see more than others do.
 

redacted_

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Oct 8, 2024
Messages
185
Reaction score
93
Location
Baltimore
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
why not run GFO instead, and what are you PO4 numbers? And you’d need at least a 5-10 micron sock to filter the precipitation out.
+1 I agree with this and going the tried and tested route (but I may be a luddite). I saw you mentioned you had chaeto, but usually a large enough fuge or scrubber be more than enough for nutrient export, as least ime. How much are you feeding?
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 27 36.5%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 3 4.1%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 32 43.2%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 24 32.4%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new