Finesse, brute force..and getting it right from the start.

Scott Fellman

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 1, 2016
Messages
395
Reaction score
711
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Finesse- fin-esse (verb): To do (something) in a subtle and delicate manner.

Have you ever noticed that, as hobbyists, when we are trying to solve a problem in one of our aquariums, the "solution"- the easy, initial one- is always to "add something" to the aquarium. Be it an additive, piece of gear, or other accessory, it's always about the addition of stuff, right?

jaubert-sump-system_large.jpg


And if it's not about adding more stuff to the aquarium, it's often about doing more "stuff": Big water changes, more extensive maintenance procedures, significant stocking adjustments...BIG moves to affect rapid, significant changes. The aquarium equivalent of brute force. Big moves.

Mansfield_-_Pic_-_MicroDerm_jets_large.jpg


And these occasional big, bold moves cost more, in terms of time, money, and energy, and often have another collateral price attached to them, in terms of animal stress, human aggravation, financial strain, and energy expended, than smaller, more "finessed" practices from Day One do.

Wouldn't finesse make more sense when affecting changes?

Or for that matter, when creating your system, why not incorporate more thought-out, measured, yet easily adjusted practices, better equipment, and long-term philosophies to set you on a proper course? In other words, plan your system with the potential problems already in mind, so that you've sort of "pre-solved" them.

Huh?

For example, if you just KNOW you're ultimately going to want more than 6 assorted Acro colonies in that aquarium, and you have the space, financial resources, and energy, wouldn't it simply make sense to start with the 75, 90, or even 120 gallon tank now, rather than go to the time, trouble and expense of building a 50 gallon system, knowing your predilection for expansion? Sure, it might cost more from the start, or even delay the start of the project, but "editing" your system after it's up and running, and then migrating to that inevitable larger tank is almost always way more expensive than just doing it the right way the first time!

marcopardun9.jpg


It's the same with equipment selection. We see this in the reef world all the time: In our enthusiasm to "get in the game", a smaller tank with perhaps "second tier" components is hastily assembled. Following the usual cycling and adjustment period, the neophyte reefer becomes aware of the shortcomings of the "quick and cheap, I'll upgrade later..." approach, laments the decisions he/she made, and begins to assemble better (and typically pricier) gear, a bigger tank, and so on soon after he or she sets up the initial tank. The realities are usually such that, if the start of the project was delayed just a short time, it could have been executed the first time in a more efficient, sustainable, and satisfying manner.

016_large.jpg


Maintenance and husbandry also come into play. It's not just about doing bigger water changes and more extensive cleanings and such. It's about planning from the start- from day one- easily accomplished and sustainable husbandry practices that can be incorporated into your routine easily and with minimum stress. By adopting, for example, small, more frequent water changes and maintenance tasks versus once a month, 40%-50% water changes and extensive maintenance sessions, the savings in time, money, and energy is huge...And the "quality of life" these more frequent, smaller, and more easily accomplished practices bring is significant.

Big "corrections" become less necessary, and far less frequent!

valon.jpg


It almost seems a bit contrarian, in a way, especially coming from a guy like me, who espouses the Facebook ethos of "move fast and break things" in business, doesn't it? However, in hobby practice, it's a far more logical and beneficial long-term strategy: Delay the smaller tank project in favor of a larger, more thought-out, better-equipped one. Create a system with an eye towards the long-term.

IMG_1142.JPG


Get your hands wet more frequently, but for less time, and purchase the best equipment you can from "the get go." All with an eye on expansion, ease of use, and long-term viability/sustainability of your effort, enjoyment, and enthusiasm. The old fable of the Tortoise and the Hare comes to mind, but we're sort of "tweaking" it a bit, aren't we?

Tortise_and_the_Hare_large.jpeg


Finesse versus brute force. Long-term versus short-term, and an understanding of our own habits and philosophies are valuable tools we can use to create an amazing, lifetime hobby experience.

Look ahead. Plan ahead. Move intelligently, if not more slowly...

Oh- and Stay Wet!

Scott Fellman
 

revhtree

Owner Administrator
View Badges
Joined
May 8, 2006
Messages
53,909
Reaction score
118,910
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
Great advice Scott!
 

scottbapilot

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Dec 16, 2014
Messages
177
Reaction score
109
Location
lancaster CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Great advise, Except one thing, I started back into the hobby (lifestyle) with a 55 gallon after a 15 year break. I wanted to make sure I still enjoyed it. I bought a used tank a sub-par equipment. I knew it wouldn't last and would not be compatible with my goal of getting a bigger tank someday. I also wanted to make sure my wife was ok with the lifestyle. It turn's out I love it more than ever (So does she). Bought a brand new 125 gallon with my wife's approval. So starting cheap was the best thing for us at the time.
 
OP
OP
Scott Fellman

Scott Fellman

Active Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 1, 2016
Messages
395
Reaction score
711
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Great advise, Except one thing, I started back into the hobby (lifestyle) with a 55 gallon after a 15 year break. I wanted to make sure I still enjoyed it. I bought a used tank a sub-par equipment. I knew it wouldn't last and would not be compatible with my goal of getting a bigger tank someday. I also wanted to make sure my wife was ok with the lifestyle. It turn's out I love it more than ever (So does she). Bought a brand new 125 gallon with my wife's approval. So starting cheap was the best thing for us at the time.
I think that sometimes, as in your case, it's absolutely the best course...More often than not, though, we see a lot of reefers trying to do things "on the cheap" with sub=par equipment and champagne aspirations...and the inevitable result is a new tank at great expense right after they started the other one...strange but predictable phenomenon...
 

Sharvey103

ReefAddicted
View Badges
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
397
Reaction score
203
Location
North Carolina
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Right on Scott. Early in the hobby (90's) I tried to do it on the cheap and it always ending up costing me significantly more with the continous upgrade not to mention the impact to the livestock. IMHO take the time to plan with the end in mind and do it properly.
 

Eienna

5000 Club Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
5,758
Reaction score
521
Location
Eddyville, KY, USA
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
This was my entry to the fishkeeping hobby - a used 29g.
Lisafirsttank_zpsfpmtfyoi.jpg

I've been all over the place since then...and yes, it has costed extra to upgrade and things like that. Now I'm at a 150g that I am LOOOVVVIIINNGG. (Don't have a recent photo at the moment, unfortunately.)
I really didn't have the luxury of starting with the largest tank I wanted, and looking back, that was a good thing because of all our home moves...but thankfully the upgrading is over. As long as this tank holds water it'll be mine. That makes me really happy...and I won't have to spend more money upgrading again. Dad got this one for $2k, which is probably the amount I'd spent on my hobby so far all over again.
 

PedroYoung

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
2,082
Reaction score
2,777
Location
Chelsea, AL
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Man, when I think what I've spent on lighting over the years, power compact, halide/ power compact, LED, now T5/LED!!! Kept thinking "this is enough for what I want to do" then decided I wanted to do MORE. I have learned the lesson on waiting till I can spend the $ to get the best.
 

TOP 10 Trending Threads

WHAT AMOUNT OF LIVE ROCK AND SAND SHOULD BE PRIORITIZED FOR OPTIMAL BIODIVERSITY/FILTRATION?

  • 100% live rock + bagged sand

    Votes: 38 27.1%
  • 100% dry rock + 100% live sand

    Votes: 47 33.6%
  • 50/50 live/dry rock, 50/50 live/bagged sand

    Votes: 31 22.1%
  • 75% live rock, 25% live sand

    Votes: 14 10.0%
  • 25% live rock, 75% live sand

    Votes: 10 7.1%
Back
Top