GFO or not

Chameleon

Valuable Member
View Badges
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
2,249
Reaction score
93
Location
Rockville, MD
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
hey yall,
I was thinking about starting a GFO reactor on my tank, but have heard mixed reviews on their effectiveness in a SPS tank. My phosphates are undetectable on a traditional test kit yet in my lab (similar to hanna checker) i get reading of about 0.02-0.03. I have heard that GFO can cause SPS to loose color. I have also heard that SPS can do really well even with high phosphates. On the other side though I was thinking GFO would could help maintain my phosphates where they are now and help prevent a future problem with high phosphates. I want to know from some people with lots of experience growing SPS what their thoughts are on GFO. I am not going to be using it to control algae, as I have none, but merely to help keep phosphates in a manageable range. What are your thoughts? Thanks in advance!
-Cham
 

btkrausen

Fish Hoarder
View Badges
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
4,836
Reaction score
103
Location
Bardstown, KY
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
My thought is that if you have no nuisance algae, and your phosphates are already very low, then why change? SPS needs a little phosphate to grow, just as natural seawater has, but using a product to lower something that doesn't need to be lowered will be just a waste of money.
 

ritter6788

Coral Fraud Private Eye
View Badges
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
24,468
Reaction score
2,538
Location
Marshall, TX
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Your phosphate numbers look good. As long as you aren't having algae troubles then I wouldn't worry about Gfo right now.
 

DO YOU THINK TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS ARE MORE HELPFUL OR HURTFUL TO REEFING?

  • More helpful.

    Votes: 19 35.8%
  • More hurtful.

    Votes: 3 5.7%
  • I think it depends mostly on the technology.

    Votes: 24 45.3%
  • I think it dependsmostly on the reefer behind the technology.

    Votes: 15 28.3%
Back
Top
Home
Post thread…
Market
What's new